GUATEMALA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
378
Grants
4
Denials
374
Grant rate: 1.1%Denial rate: 98.9%
Immigration judge
Seligman, Darlene R.
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Court
- Pending
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
13.5%
214 / 1586
Total decisions
1586
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
13.5%
Grants: 214
Denial rate
86.5%
Denials: 1372
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants214 / 1586
Denials1372 / 1586
Other relief0 / 1586
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUATEMALA Larger sample | 378 | 4 | 374 | 1.1% | 98.9% | View details | |
MEXICO Larger sample | 263 | 4 | 259 | 1.5% | 98.5% | View details | |
EL SALVADOR Larger sample | 199 | 1 | 198 | 0.5% | 99.5% | View details | |
ARMENIA Larger sample | 82 | 28 | 54 | 34.1% | 65.9% | View details | |
PHILIPPINES Larger sample | 72 | 4 | 68 | 5.6% | 94.4% | View details | |
CHINA Larger sample | 64 | 26 | 38 | 40.6% | 59.4% | View details | |
PERU Larger sample | 54 | 14 | 40 | 25.9% | 74.1% | View details | |
HONDURAS Larger sample | 49 | 2 | 47 | 4.1% | 95.9% | View details | |
INDIA Larger sample | 49 | 6 | 43 | 12.2% | 87.8% | View details | |
IRAN Larger sample | 48 | 25 | 23 | 52.1% | 47.9% | View details | |
PAKISTAN Larger sample | 36 | 6 | 30 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
BANGLADESH Larger sample | 35 | 14 | 21 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
NICARAGUA Larger sample | 30 | 0 | 30 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
RUSSIA Medium sample | 21 | 12 | 9 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
COLOMBIA Medium sample | 17 | 6 | 11 | 35.3% | 64.7% | View details | |
GEORGIA Medium sample | 13 | 6 | 7 | 46.2% | 53.8% | View details | |
EGYPT Medium sample | 12 | 9 | 3 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
ETHIOPIA Medium sample | 10 | 7 | 3 | 70.0% | 30.0% | View details | |
ROMANIA Small sample | 9 | 3 | 6 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
ARGENTINA Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
MEXICO
Larger sampleTotal decisions
263
Grants
4
Denials
259
Grant rate: 1.5%Denial rate: 98.5%
EL SALVADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
199
Grants
1
Denials
198
Grant rate: 0.5%Denial rate: 99.5%
ARMENIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
82
Grants
28
Denials
54
Grant rate: 34.1%Denial rate: 65.9%
PHILIPPINES
Larger sampleTotal decisions
72
Grants
4
Denials
68
Grant rate: 5.6%Denial rate: 94.4%
CHINA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
64
Grants
26
Denials
38
Grant rate: 40.6%Denial rate: 59.4%
PERU
Larger sampleTotal decisions
54
Grants
14
Denials
40
Grant rate: 25.9%Denial rate: 74.1%
HONDURAS
Larger sampleTotal decisions
49
Grants
2
Denials
47
Grant rate: 4.1%Denial rate: 95.9%
INDIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
49
Grants
6
Denials
43
Grant rate: 12.2%Denial rate: 87.8%
IRAN
Larger sampleTotal decisions
48
Grants
25
Denials
23
Grant rate: 52.1%Denial rate: 47.9%
PAKISTAN
Larger sampleTotal decisions
36
Grants
6
Denials
30
Grant rate: 16.7%Denial rate: 83.3%
BANGLADESH
Larger sampleTotal decisions
35
Grants
14
Denials
21
Grant rate: 40.0%Denial rate: 60.0%
NICARAGUA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
30
Grants
0
Denials
30
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
RUSSIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
21
Grants
12
Denials
9
Grant rate: 57.1%Denial rate: 42.9%
COLOMBIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
6
Denials
11
Grant rate: 35.3%Denial rate: 64.7%
GEORGIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
6
Denials
7
Grant rate: 46.2%Denial rate: 53.8%
EGYPT
Medium sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
9
Denials
3
Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%
ETHIOPIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
7
Denials
3
Grant rate: 70.0%Denial rate: 30.0%
ROMANIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
3
Denials
6
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
ARGENTINA
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.