HAITI
Larger sampleTotal decisions
1340
Grants
116
Denials
1224
Grant rate: 8.7%Denial rate: 91.3%
Immigration judge
Sanders, Charles J.
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Court
- Pending
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
18.2%
683 / 3753
Total decisions
3753
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
18.2%
Grants: 683
Denial rate
81.8%
Denials: 3070
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants683 / 3753
Denials3070 / 3753
Other relief0 / 3753
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAITI Larger sample | 1340 | 116 | 1224 | 8.7% | 91.3% | View details | |
COLOMBIA Larger sample | 741 | 139 | 602 | 18.8% | 81.2% | View details | |
GUATEMALA Larger sample | 260 | 14 | 246 | 5.4% | 94.6% | View details | |
HONDURAS Larger sample | 252 | 40 | 212 | 15.9% | 84.1% | View details | |
VENEZUELA Larger sample | 184 | 44 | 140 | 23.9% | 76.1% | View details | |
NICARAGUA Larger sample | 126 | 34 | 92 | 27.0% | 73.0% | View details | |
CHINA Larger sample | 103 | 44 | 59 | 42.7% | 57.3% | View details | |
EL SALVADOR Larger sample | 102 | 10 | 92 | 9.8% | 90.2% | View details | |
PERU Larger sample | 90 | 17 | 73 | 18.9% | 81.1% | View details | |
CUBA Larger sample | 84 | 32 | 52 | 38.1% | 61.9% | View details | |
INDIA Larger sample | 37 | 20 | 17 | 54.1% | 45.9% | View details | |
MAURITANIA Larger sample | 34 | 5 | 29 | 14.7% | 85.3% | View details | |
ALBANIA Larger sample | 33 | 10 | 23 | 30.3% | 69.7% | View details | |
MEXICO Larger sample | 33 | 1 | 32 | 3.0% | 97.0% | View details | |
SOMALIA Medium sample | 29 | 16 | 13 | 55.2% | 44.8% | View details | |
RUSSIA Medium sample | 23 | 17 | 6 | 73.9% | 26.1% | View details | |
KAZAKHSTAN Medium sample | 20 | 19 | 1 | 95.0% | 5.0% | View details | |
BRAZIL Medium sample | 18 | 2 | 16 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
GUYANA Medium sample | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
JORDAN Medium sample | 11 | 5 | 6 | 45.5% | 54.5% | View details |
View details
COLOMBIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
741
Grants
139
Denials
602
Grant rate: 18.8%Denial rate: 81.2%
GUATEMALA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
260
Grants
14
Denials
246
Grant rate: 5.4%Denial rate: 94.6%
HONDURAS
Larger sampleTotal decisions
252
Grants
40
Denials
212
Grant rate: 15.9%Denial rate: 84.1%
VENEZUELA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
184
Grants
44
Denials
140
Grant rate: 23.9%Denial rate: 76.1%
NICARAGUA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
126
Grants
34
Denials
92
Grant rate: 27.0%Denial rate: 73.0%
CHINA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
103
Grants
44
Denials
59
Grant rate: 42.7%Denial rate: 57.3%
EL SALVADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
102
Grants
10
Denials
92
Grant rate: 9.8%Denial rate: 90.2%
PERU
Larger sampleTotal decisions
90
Grants
17
Denials
73
Grant rate: 18.9%Denial rate: 81.1%
CUBA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
84
Grants
32
Denials
52
Grant rate: 38.1%Denial rate: 61.9%
INDIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
37
Grants
20
Denials
17
Grant rate: 54.1%Denial rate: 45.9%
MAURITANIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
34
Grants
5
Denials
29
Grant rate: 14.7%Denial rate: 85.3%
ALBANIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
33
Grants
10
Denials
23
Grant rate: 30.3%Denial rate: 69.7%
MEXICO
Larger sampleTotal decisions
33
Grants
1
Denials
32
Grant rate: 3.0%Denial rate: 97.0%
SOMALIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
29
Grants
16
Denials
13
Grant rate: 55.2%Denial rate: 44.8%
RUSSIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
23
Grants
17
Denials
6
Grant rate: 73.9%Denial rate: 26.1%
KAZAKHSTAN
Medium sampleTotal decisions
20
Grants
19
Denials
1
Grant rate: 95.0%Denial rate: 5.0%
BRAZIL
Medium sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
2
Denials
16
Grant rate: 11.1%Denial rate: 88.9%
GUYANA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
0
Denials
12
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
JORDAN
Medium sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
5
Denials
6
Grant rate: 45.5%Denial rate: 54.5%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.