HONDURAS
Larger sampleTotal decisions
45
Grants
23
Denials
22
Grant rate: 51.1%Denial rate: 48.9%
Immigration judge
Petit, Anam Rahman.
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Court
- Pending
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
51.3%
139 / 271
Total decisions
271
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
51.3%
Grants: 139
Denial rate
48.7%
Denials: 132
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants139 / 271
Denials132 / 271
Other relief0 / 271
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HONDURAS Larger sample | 45 | 23 | 22 | 51.1% | 48.9% | View details | |
BOLIVIA Larger sample | 37 | 9 | 28 | 24.3% | 75.7% | View details | |
EL SALVADOR Larger sample | 35 | 21 | 14 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
PERU Larger sample | 33 | 16 | 17 | 48.5% | 51.5% | View details | |
GUATEMALA Medium sample | 20 | 9 | 11 | 45.0% | 55.0% | View details | |
NICARAGUA Medium sample | 19 | 11 | 8 | 57.9% | 42.1% | View details | |
COLOMBIA Medium sample | 14 | 7 | 7 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
MAURITANIA Medium sample | 11 | 5 | 6 | 45.5% | 54.5% | View details | |
BURKINA FASO Medium sample | 10 | 6 | 4 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
TURKIYE Medium sample | 10 | 9 | 1 | 90.0% | 10.0% | View details | |
TAJIKISTAN (TADZHIK) Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
CHINA Small sample | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
EGYPT Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
AFGHANISTAN Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
RUSSIA Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
ETHIOPIA Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
INDIA Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
TURKMENISTAN Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
VENEZUELA Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
BANGLADESH Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
View details
BOLIVIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
37
Grants
9
Denials
28
Grant rate: 24.3%Denial rate: 75.7%
EL SALVADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
35
Grants
21
Denials
14
Grant rate: 60.0%Denial rate: 40.0%
PERU
Larger sampleTotal decisions
33
Grants
16
Denials
17
Grant rate: 48.5%Denial rate: 51.5%
GUATEMALA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
20
Grants
9
Denials
11
Grant rate: 45.0%Denial rate: 55.0%
NICARAGUA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
19
Grants
11
Denials
8
Grant rate: 57.9%Denial rate: 42.1%
COLOMBIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
14
Grants
7
Denials
7
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
MAURITANIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
5
Denials
6
Grant rate: 45.5%Denial rate: 54.5%
BURKINA FASO
Medium sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
6
Denials
4
Grant rate: 60.0%Denial rate: 40.0%
TURKIYE
Medium sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
9
Denials
1
Grant rate: 90.0%Denial rate: 10.0%
TAJIKISTAN (TADZHIK)
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
CHINA
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
2
Denials
2
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
EGYPT
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
AFGHANISTAN
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
RUSSIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
ETHIOPIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
INDIA
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
TURKMENISTAN
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
VENEZUELA
Small sampleTotal decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
BANGLADESH
Small sampleTotal decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.