CHINA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
283
Grants
101
Denials
182
Grant rate: 35.7%Denial rate: 64.3%
Immigration judge
Ho, Anna
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Court
- Pending
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
23.2%
429 / 1851
Total decisions
1851
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
23.2%
Grants: 429
Denial rate
76.8%
Denials: 1422
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants429 / 1851
Denials1422 / 1851
Other relief0 / 1851
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHINA Larger sample | 283 | 101 | 182 | 35.7% | 64.3% | View details | |
EL SALVADOR Larger sample | 254 | 7 | 247 | 2.8% | 97.2% | View details | |
GUATEMALA Larger sample | 192 | 16 | 176 | 8.3% | 91.7% | View details | |
MEXICO Larger sample | 153 | 3 | 150 | 2.0% | 98.0% | View details | |
INDIA Larger sample | 96 | 16 | 80 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
ARMENIA Larger sample | 88 | 54 | 34 | 61.4% | 38.6% | View details | |
INDONESIA Larger sample | 81 | 9 | 72 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
RUSSIA Larger sample | 59 | 16 | 43 | 27.1% | 72.9% | View details | |
HONDURAS Larger sample | 47 | 2 | 45 | 4.3% | 95.7% | View details | |
SOMALIA Larger sample | 42 | 17 | 25 | 40.5% | 59.5% | View details | |
IRAN Larger sample | 38 | 20 | 18 | 52.6% | 47.4% | View details | |
SRI LANKA Larger sample | 38 | 11 | 27 | 28.9% | 71.1% | View details | |
UKRAINE Medium sample | 27 | 6 | 21 | 22.2% | 77.8% | View details | |
ETHIOPIA Medium sample | 20 | 8 | 12 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
BULGARIA Medium sample | 19 | 7 | 12 | 36.8% | 63.2% | View details | |
PERU Medium sample | 18 | 6 | 12 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
PHILIPPINES Medium sample | 18 | 0 | 18 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Former Countries Medium sample | 17 | 6 | 11 | 35.3% | 64.7% | View details | |
ROMANIA Medium sample | 17 | 6 | 11 | 35.3% | 64.7% | View details | |
VIETNAM Medium sample | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
EL SALVADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
254
Grants
7
Denials
247
Grant rate: 2.8%Denial rate: 97.2%
GUATEMALA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
192
Grants
16
Denials
176
Grant rate: 8.3%Denial rate: 91.7%
MEXICO
Larger sampleTotal decisions
153
Grants
3
Denials
150
Grant rate: 2.0%Denial rate: 98.0%
INDIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
96
Grants
16
Denials
80
Grant rate: 16.7%Denial rate: 83.3%
ARMENIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
88
Grants
54
Denials
34
Grant rate: 61.4%Denial rate: 38.6%
INDONESIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
81
Grants
9
Denials
72
Grant rate: 11.1%Denial rate: 88.9%
RUSSIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
59
Grants
16
Denials
43
Grant rate: 27.1%Denial rate: 72.9%
HONDURAS
Larger sampleTotal decisions
47
Grants
2
Denials
45
Grant rate: 4.3%Denial rate: 95.7%
SOMALIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
42
Grants
17
Denials
25
Grant rate: 40.5%Denial rate: 59.5%
IRAN
Larger sampleTotal decisions
38
Grants
20
Denials
18
Grant rate: 52.6%Denial rate: 47.4%
SRI LANKA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
38
Grants
11
Denials
27
Grant rate: 28.9%Denial rate: 71.1%
UKRAINE
Medium sampleTotal decisions
27
Grants
6
Denials
21
Grant rate: 22.2%Denial rate: 77.8%
ETHIOPIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
20
Grants
8
Denials
12
Grant rate: 40.0%Denial rate: 60.0%
BULGARIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
19
Grants
7
Denials
12
Grant rate: 36.8%Denial rate: 63.2%
PERU
Medium sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
6
Denials
12
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
PHILIPPINES
Medium sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
0
Denials
18
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Former Countries
Medium sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
6
Denials
11
Grant rate: 35.3%Denial rate: 64.7%
ROMANIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
6
Denials
11
Grant rate: 35.3%Denial rate: 64.7%
VIETNAM
Medium sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
0
Denials
15
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.