Margaret R MacGregor
This court
Decisiones totales
282
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
12.8%
Denegaciones
87.2%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
← Back to all courtsactive active
Tribunal de inmigración
Pep Immigration Court
Debate comunitario · 03 judges · TX
- City / state
- Immigration Court, TX
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Tasa promedio de aprobación
9.9%
93 / 941
Tasa promedio de aprobación
9.9%
Aprobaciones de asilo
93
Denegaciones
848
Jueces incluidos
3
Pep Immigration Court has 3 indexed immigration judges. Court-level statistics are based on public EOIR records.
Perspectiva de la comunidad
Debate comunitario
Lee experiencias públicas y conversaciones sobre procesos relacionados con Pep Immigration Court.
0 temas
Puedes empezar con estos temas públicos
- Comparte una experiencia de proceso público
- Habla de cómo interpretar datos públicos
- Haz una pregunta sin datos de un caso personal
Jueces incluidos en este tribunal
Review asylum decision statistics for indexed judges at this court.
active
Jason Smith
This court
Decisiones totales
35
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
11.4%
Denegaciones
88.6%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
Nancy Nevarez-Myrick
This court
Decisiones totales
24
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
8.3%
Denegaciones
91.7%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Moderate sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
Grant rate by nationality
| Nationality | Grant rate | Grants | Denials | Decisions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| México | 5.0% | 5 | 96 | 101 |
| Rusia | 39.7% | 27 | 41 | 68 |
| Irán | 20.0% | 11 | 44 | 55 |
| Venezuela | 3.6% | 2 | 53 | 55 |
| Honduras | 0.0% | 0 | 53 | 53 |
| Colombia | 0.0% | 0 | 50 | 50 |
| Cuba | 12.0% | 6 | 44 | 50 |
| Afganistán | 22.9% | 11 | 37 | 48 |
| El Salvador | 0.0% | 0 | 41 | 41 |
| India | 4.2% | 1 | 23 | 24 |
| China | 27.3% | 6 | 16 | 22 |
| Guatemala | 9.5% | 2 | 19 | 21 |
| ANGOLA | 5.0% | 1 | 19 | 20 |
| Camerún | 5.6% | 1 | 17 | 18 |
| Nepal | 16.7% | 3 | 15 | 18 |
| República Dominicana | 0.0% | 0 | 17 | 17 |
| TOGO | 0.0% | 0 | 16 | 16 |
| GEORGIA | 26.7% | 4 | 11 | 15 |
| Ecuador | 7.1% | 1 | 13 | 14 |
| KIRGHIZIA (KYRGYZSTAN) | 7.1% | 1 | 13 | 14 |
| Bangladés | 8.3% | 1 | 11 | 12 |
| Brasil | 8.3% | 1 | 11 | 12 |
| DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO | 0.0% | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Egipto | 0.0% | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Nicaragua | 18.2% | 2 | 9 | 11 |
| Nigeria | 0.0% | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| CONGO | 0.0% | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Haití | 0.0% | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Pakistán | 10.0% | 1 | 9 | 10 |
| Perú | 0.0% | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| TURKIYE | 25.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 |
| Siria | 0.0% | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Etiopía | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| SRI LANKA | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| ZIMBABWE | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| GUINEA | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Irak | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| JORDAN | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Vietnam | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| AZERBAIJAN | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| BOLIVIA | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| BURKINA FASO | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| ERITREA | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| GAMBIA | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ghana | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| ISRAEL | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| KAZAKHSTAN | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| MAURITANIA | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| NIGER | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| TAJIKISTAN (TADZHIK) | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ucrania | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| LEBANON | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MALI | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| SOMALIA | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| SUDAN | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| TUNISIA | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| ALBANIA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| ALGERIA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| ARMENIA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| BELIZE | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| BURMA (MYANMAR) | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| CHILE | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| EQUATORIAL GUINEA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| JAMAICA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MACEDONIA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MALAYSIA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| PANAMA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| RWANDA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| SOUTH SUDAN | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| SPAIN | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| STATELESS - ALIEN UNABLE TO NAME A COUNTRY | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| UGANDA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Yemen | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Data source and disclaimer
Data comes from public EOIR records. It is for informational use only, is not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.