Meyer, Abby L
This court
Decisiones totales
1539
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
3.8%
Denegaciones
96.2%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
← Back to all courtsactive active active active active active active
Tribunal de inmigración
Immigration Court Immigration Court
8 judges · NE
- City / state
- Immigration Court, NE
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Tasa promedio de aprobación
11.0%
867 / 7876
Tasa promedio de aprobación
11.0%
Aprobaciones de asilo
867
Denegaciones
7009
Jueces incluidos
8
Immigration Court Immigration Court has 8 indexed immigration judges. Court-level statistics are based on public EOIR records.
Jueces incluidos en este tribunal
Review asylum decision statistics for indexed judges at this court.
active
Morrissey, Matthew E
This court
Decisiones totales
1307
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
4.1%
Denegaciones
95.9%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
Larsen, Alexandra R
This court
Decisiones totales
1093
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
3.5%
Denegaciones
96.5%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
Anderson, Jack L.
This court
Decisiones totales
883
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
18.2%
Denegaciones
81.8%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
Paul, Nancy J.
This court
Decisiones totales
229
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
15.7%
Denegaciones
84.3%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
Dillow, Eric
This court
Decisiones totales
96
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
17.7%
Denegaciones
82.3%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
Stransky, Eric
This court
Decisiones totales
69
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
0.0%
Denegaciones
100.0%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
Roman, Juan
This court
Decisiones totales
61
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
0.0%
Denegaciones
100.0%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
Grant rate by nationality
| Nationality | Grant rate | Grants | Denials | Decisions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GUATEMALA | 6.0% | 203 | 3182 | 3385 |
| EL SALVADOR | 7.3% | 85 | 1085 | 1170 |
| MEXICO | 3.2% | 28 | 836 | 864 |
| HONDURAS | 5.0% | 29 | 553 | 582 |
| NICARAGUA | 6.7% | 11 | 152 | 163 |
| SUDAN | 20.6% | 26 | 100 | 126 |
| COLOMBIA | 27.6% | 27 | 71 | 98 |
| CUBA | 20.4% | 19 | 74 | 93 |
| CHINA | 44.8% | 26 | 32 | 58 |
| TOGO | 39.3% | 22 | 34 | 56 |
| IRAQ | 20.0% | 10 | 40 | 50 |
| SOMALIA | 36.0% | 18 | 32 | 50 |
| INDIA | 45.8% | 22 | 26 | 48 |
| BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA | 2.1% | 1 | 46 | 47 |
| LAOS | 15.2% | 7 | 39 | 46 |
| PERU | 18.2% | 8 | 36 | 44 |
| ETHIOPIA | 48.8% | 21 | 22 | 43 |
| VENEZUELA | 20.9% | 9 | 34 | 43 |
| RUSSIA | 50.0% | 20 | 20 | 40 |
| VIETNAM | 5.0% | 2 | 38 | 40 |
| ECUADOR | 0.0% | 0 | 37 | 37 |
| LIBERIA | 5.4% | 2 | 35 | 37 |
| BURMA (MYANMAR) | 16.7% | 6 | 30 | 36 |
| CAMEROON | 48.5% | 16 | 17 | 33 |
| SOUTH SUDAN | 3.0% | 1 | 32 | 33 |
| ZIMBABWE | 80.6% | 25 | 6 | 31 |
| AFGHANISTAN | 63.0% | 17 | 10 | 27 |
| ROMANIA | 0.0% | 0 | 27 | 27 |
| SOUTH AFRICA | 72.0% | 18 | 7 | 25 |
| CONGO | 70.8% | 17 | 7 | 24 |
| INDONESIA | 29.2% | 7 | 17 | 24 |
| IRAN | 26.1% | 6 | 17 | 23 |
| NIGERIA | 50.0% | 11 | 11 | 22 |
| ERITREA | 42.9% | 9 | 12 | 21 |
| DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO | 30.0% | 6 | 14 | 20 |
| KAZAKHSTAN | 65.0% | 13 | 7 | 20 |
| KENYA | 44.4% | 8 | 10 | 18 |
| PAKISTAN | 52.9% | 9 | 8 | 17 |
| TAJIKISTAN (TADZHIK) | 23.5% | 4 | 13 | 17 |
| ANGOLA | 6.3% | 1 | 15 | 16 |
| NEPAL | 66.7% | 8 | 4 | 12 |
| BHUTAN | 0.0% | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| BURKINA FASO | 9.1% | 1 | 10 | 11 |
| HAITI | 27.3% | 3 | 8 | 11 |
| KIRGHIZIA (KYRGYZSTAN) | 45.5% | 5 | 6 | 11 |
| SIERRA LEONE | 9.1% | 1 | 10 | 11 |
| UGANDA | 54.5% | 6 | 5 | 11 |
| NIGER | 60.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 |
| UZBEKISTAN | 88.9% | 8 | 1 | 9 |
| BURUNDI | 12.5% | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| EGYPT | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 |
| SAUDI ARABIA | 37.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| GAMBIA | 42.9% | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| GUINEA | 42.9% | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| LEBANON | 0.0% | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| RWANDA | 71.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 |
| TANZANIA | 0.0% | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| THAILAND | 0.0% | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| BELIZE | 0.0% | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Former Countries | 66.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| GHANA | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| ISRAEL | 16.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| POLAND | 0.0% | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| UNKNOWN NATIONALITY | 0.0% | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| IVORY COAST (COTE D'IVOIRE) | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| SYRIA | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| UKRAINE | 20.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| ZAMBIA | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| BRAZIL | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| MALI | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| PHILIPPINES | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| UNKNOWN NATIONALITY | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| ZAIRE | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| ALBANIA | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| ARMENIA | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| BENIN | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| CHAD | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| GABON | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| GEORGIA | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| JAMAICA | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| SRI LANKA | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| ALGERIA | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| CAMBODIA | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| COSTA RICA | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| CROATIA | 100.0% | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| CZECH REPUBLIC | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| DOMINICAN REPUBLIC | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| FRANCE | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Former Countries | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| JORDAN | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| LIBYA | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MAURITANIA | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MONGOLIA | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| SENEGAL | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| SLOVAK REPUBLIC | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| THE REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| TURKIYE | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| BANGLADESH | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Data source and disclaimer
Data comes from public EOIR records. It is for informational use only, is not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.