David Ayala
This court
Decisiones totales
1170
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
34.7%
Denegaciones
65.3%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
← Back to all courtsactive active active active active active active active active active
Tribunal de inmigración
Hlg Immigration Court
Debate comunitario · 011 judges · TX
- City / state
- Immigration Court, TX
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Tasa promedio de aprobación
26.5%
1511 / 5692
Tasa promedio de aprobación
26.5%
Aprobaciones de asilo
1511
Denegaciones
4181
Jueces incluidos
11
Hlg Immigration Court has 11 indexed immigration judges. Court-level statistics are based on public EOIR records.
Perspectiva de la comunidad
Debate comunitario
Lee experiencias públicas y conversaciones sobre procesos relacionados con Hlg Immigration Court.
0 temas
Puedes empezar con estos temas públicos
- Comparte una experiencia de proceso público
- Habla de cómo interpretar datos públicos
- Haz una pregunta sin datos de un caso personal
Jueces incluidos en este tribunal
Review asylum decision statistics for indexed judges at this court.
active
Julian Castaneda
This court
Decisiones totales
515
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
12.4%
Denegaciones
87.6%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
Joseph T Leonard
This court
Decisiones totales
460
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
21.7%
Denegaciones
78.3%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
Delia I Gonzalez
This court
Decisiones totales
414
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
15.0%
Denegaciones
85.0%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
Gregory Z. Meyerson
This court
Decisiones totales
390
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
17.4%
Denegaciones
82.6%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
Marium S. Uddin
This court
Decisiones totales
212
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
13.7%
Denegaciones
86.3%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
Melissa Joy Garcia
This court
Decisiones totales
148
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
32.4%
Denegaciones
67.6%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
Christopher Pineda
This court
Decisiones totales
71
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
12.7%
Denegaciones
87.3%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
Daniel B. Gilbert
This court
Decisiones totales
49
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
22.4%
Denegaciones
77.5%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
Adam Rodriguez
This court
Decisiones totales
16
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
0.0%
Denegaciones
100.0%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Moderate sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
Andrew Galvao
This court
Decisiones totales
3
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
0.0%
Denegaciones
100.0%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Very small sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
Grant rate by nationality
| Nationality | Grant rate | Grants | Denials | Decisions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicaragua | 27.3% | 315 | 838 | 1153 |
| Honduras | 18.9% | 186 | 796 | 982 |
| México | 13.2% | 103 | 675 | 778 |
| El Salvador | 15.9% | 109 | 575 | 684 |
| Cuba | 24.8% | 149 | 453 | 602 |
| Guatemala | 29.0% | 133 | 326 | 459 |
| Venezuela | 42.3% | 155 | 211 | 366 |
| China | 67.0% | 75 | 37 | 112 |
| ERITREA | 84.5% | 87 | 16 | 103 |
| Colombia | 26.9% | 18 | 49 | 67 |
| Perú | 23.3% | 10 | 33 | 43 |
| Etiopía | 77.8% | 28 | 8 | 36 |
| India | 17.6% | 6 | 28 | 34 |
| Nepal | 57.1% | 12 | 9 | 21 |
| Ecuador | 26.3% | 5 | 14 | 19 |
| SOMALIA | 81.3% | 13 | 3 | 16 |
| SRI LANKA | 40.0% | 6 | 9 | 15 |
| STATELESS - ALIEN UNABLE TO NAME A COUNTRY | 0.0% | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Pakistán | 53.8% | 7 | 6 | 13 |
| Camerún | 83.3% | 10 | 2 | 12 |
| Irak | 100.0% | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| República Dominicana | 0.0% | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| JAMAICA | 0.0% | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| ALBANIA | 62.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 |
| Irán | 100.0% | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Nigeria | 16.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| ROMANIA | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Bangladés | 80.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| Brasil | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Egipto | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| PHILIPPINES | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| RWANDA | 80.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| SUDAN | 100.0% | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| BURMA (MYANMAR) | 75.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| NO NATIONALITY | 100.0% | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| PORTUGAL | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Ghana | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Rusia | 100.0% | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| SAUDI ARABIA | 100.0% | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| TURKIYE | 100.0% | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| ARGENTINA | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| BELIZE | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| BOLIVIA | 100.0% | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| COSTA RICA | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Former Countries | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| GEORGIA | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Haití | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| KENYA | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| LEBANON | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Senegal | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| URUGUAY | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| UZBEKISTAN | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| ALGERIA | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| ANGOLA | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| AZERBAIJAN | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| BULGARIA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| CAYMAN ISLANDS | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| CHAD | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Former Countries | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GUINEA | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GUYANA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| HOLLAND | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| INDONESIA | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| IVORY COAST (COTE D'IVOIRE) | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| JORDAN | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| KIRGHIZIA (KYRGYZSTAN) | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MALAWI | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MAURITANIA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MOROCCO | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| PALESTINE | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| SIERRA LEONE | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| SOUTH AFRICA | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| SPAIN | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Siria | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| UGANDA | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Ucrania | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| UNKNOWN NATIONALITY | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| UNKNOWN NATIONALITY | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Yemen | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| ZAIRE | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| ZIMBABWE | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Data source and disclaimer
Data comes from public EOIR records. It is for informational use only, is not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.