Bruce A Taylor
This court
Decisiones totales
770
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
11.9%
Denegaciones
88.0%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
← Back to all courtsactive active active active
Tribunal de inmigración
Flo Immigration Court
Debate comunitario · 05 judges · AZ
- City / state
- Immigration Court, AZ
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Tasa promedio de aprobación
16.3%
552 / 3393
Tasa promedio de aprobación
16.3%
Aprobaciones de asilo
552
Denegaciones
2841
Jueces incluidos
5
Flo Immigration Court has 5 indexed immigration judges. Court-level statistics are based on public EOIR records.
Perspectiva de la comunidad
Debate comunitario
Lee experiencias públicas y conversaciones sobre procesos relacionados con Flo Immigration Court.
0 temas
Puedes empezar con estos temas públicos
- Comparte una experiencia de proceso público
- Habla de cómo interpretar datos públicos
- Haz una pregunta sin datos de un caso personal
Jueces incluidos en este tribunal
Review asylum decision statistics for indexed judges at this court.
active
Scott M. Jefferies
This court
Decisiones totales
533
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
16.9%
Denegaciones
83.1%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
Victoria Levin
This court
Decisiones totales
327
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
48.9%
Denegaciones
51.1%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
Molly S. Frazer
This court
Decisiones totales
166
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
34.3%
Denegaciones
65.7%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
Cara O'Driscoll Knapp
This court
Decisiones totales
61
Tasa de aprobación de asilo
1.6%
Denegaciones
98.4%
Tasa de otras formas de alivio
0.0%
Larger sample
Datos actualizados: 8 jul 2026
Grant rate by nationality
| Nationality | Grant rate | Grants | Denials | Decisions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| México | 3.3% | 26 | 766 | 792 |
| Guatemala | 9.2% | 38 | 377 | 415 |
| El Salvador | 6.7% | 23 | 318 | 341 |
| Honduras | 7.2% | 23 | 296 | 319 |
| Cuba | 29.6% | 63 | 150 | 213 |
| China | 53.4% | 86 | 75 | 161 |
| Nicaragua | 25.9% | 28 | 80 | 108 |
| Venezuela | 26.5% | 22 | 61 | 83 |
| India | 27.3% | 21 | 56 | 77 |
| Rusia | 44.6% | 29 | 36 | 65 |
| Haití | 8.8% | 5 | 52 | 57 |
| Bangladés | 23.3% | 10 | 33 | 43 |
| Camerún | 66.7% | 26 | 13 | 39 |
| Colombia | 12.8% | 5 | 34 | 39 |
| Vietnam | 22.2% | 8 | 28 | 36 |
| Irán | 50.0% | 17 | 17 | 34 |
| Ecuador | 0.0% | 0 | 25 | 25 |
| Irak | 45.8% | 11 | 13 | 24 |
| ARMENIA | 22.7% | 5 | 17 | 22 |
| JAMAICA | 0.0% | 0 | 22 | 22 |
| PHILIPPINES | 0.0% | 0 | 19 | 19 |
| Etiopía | 38.9% | 7 | 11 | 18 |
| SUDAN | 35.3% | 6 | 11 | 17 |
| Nigeria | 18.8% | 3 | 13 | 16 |
| Perú | 6.3% | 1 | 15 | 16 |
| BULGARIA | 0.0% | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| SOMALIA | 50.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 |
| Ucrania | 30.8% | 4 | 9 | 13 |
| Afganistán | 33.3% | 4 | 8 | 12 |
| UZBEKISTAN | 33.3% | 4 | 8 | 12 |
| Brasil | 18.2% | 2 | 9 | 11 |
| LAOS | 0.0% | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| LIBERIA | 27.3% | 3 | 8 | 11 |
| SRI LANKA | 81.8% | 9 | 2 | 11 |
| Egipto | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 |
| Pakistán | 22.2% | 2 | 7 | 9 |
| BURMA (MYANMAR) | 12.5% | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| CAMBODIA | 25.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 |
| Senegal | 12.5% | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| UNKNOWN NATIONALITY | 0.0% | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| República Dominicana | 14.3% | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| ERITREA | 71.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 |
| GEORGIA | 28.6% | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| KENYA | 14.3% | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| MAURITANIA | 14.3% | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| ROMANIA | 0.0% | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Siria | 42.9% | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| BELARUS | 66.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA | 16.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| KIRGHIZIA (KYRGYZSTAN) | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| TOGO | 16.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| AZERBAIJAN | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| CONGO | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO | 20.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| FIJI | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Ghana | 20.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| GUYANA | 20.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| LEBANON | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Nepal | 20.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| SIERRA LEONE | 20.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Yemen | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| ANGOLA | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| CANADA | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| INDONESIA | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| JORDAN | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| MOROCCO | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| NORTH KOREA | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| TURKIYE | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| ALBANIA | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| ALGERIA | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| BELIZE | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| CROATIA | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Former Countries | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| GUINEA | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| ISRAEL | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| KAZAKHSTAN | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| MOLDAVIA (MOLDOVA) | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| THAILAND | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| UGANDA | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| BURKINA FASO | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| HUNGARY | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| MACEDONIA | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| MALAYSIA | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| RWANDA | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| SAMOA | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| SOUTH AFRICA | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| SOUTH SUDAN | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| TAJIKISTAN (TADZHIK) | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| AUSTRALIA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| BARBADOS | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| BOLIVIA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| BURUNDI | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| CHAD | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| CHILE | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| COSTA RICA | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GAMBIA | 100.0% | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GREECE | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GUADELOUPE | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| HOLLAND | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Data source and disclaimer
Data comes from public EOIR records. It is for informational use only, is not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.