Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
94
Grants
2
Denials
92
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
29.3%
106 / 362
Total decisions
362
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
29.3%
Grants: 106
Denial rate
70.7%
Denials: 256
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Curtis G. White as an immigration judge in June 2020. Judge White earned dual Bachelor of Arts degrees in 2001 from Idaho State Universityand a Master of Arts and Juris Doctor in 2006 from the University of New Mexico. From 2018 to 2020, he served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of Chief Counsel (OCC), Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in El Paso, Texas. From 2016 to 2018, he served as an assistant chiefcounsel, OCC, OPLA, ICE, DHS, in Adelanto, California. From 2012 to 2016, he was in privatepractice, in Houston. From 2007 to 2012, he was in private practice, in Salt Lake City, exceptfrom 2010 to 2011, when he served as a prosecutor for the city of South Salt Lake, Utah. Judge White is a member of the State Bar of Texas and the Utah State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Curtis G White.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 94 | 2 | 92 | 2.1% | 97.9% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 66 | 10 | 56 | 15.2% | 84.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 32 | 4 | 28 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 26 | 15 | 11 | 57.7% | 42.3% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 25 | 21 | 4 | 84.0% | 16.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 19 | 15 | 4 | 78.9% | 21.1% | View details | |
Armenia Moderate sample | 15 | 13 | 2 | 86.7% | 13.3% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 15 | 2 | 13 | 13.3% | 86.7% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
India Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Iceland Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ukraine Small sample | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Tristan da Cunha Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Jamaica Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Moldova Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
94
Grants
2
Denials
92
Total decisions
66
Grants
10
Denials
56
Total decisions
32
Grants
4
Denials
28
Total decisions
26
Grants
15
Denials
11
Total decisions
25
Grants
21
Denials
4
Total decisions
19
Grants
15
Denials
4
Total decisions
15
Grants
13
Denials
2
Total decisions
15
Grants
2
Denials
13
Total decisions
6
Grants
4
Denials
2
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
4
Denials
1
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
4
Grants
2
Denials
2
Total decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.