GUATEMALA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
166
Grants
6
Denials
160
Grant rate: 3.6%Denial rate: 96.4%
Immigration judge
Warren, Kendall
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Court
- Pending
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
8.5%
71 / 835
Total decisions
835
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
8.5%
Grants: 71
Denial rate
91.5%
Denials: 764
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Outcome distribution
Grants71 / 835
Denials764 / 835
Other relief0 / 835
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUATEMALA Larger sample | 166 | 6 | 160 | 3.6% | 96.4% | View details | |
CHINA Larger sample | 82 | 9 | 73 | 11.0% | 89.0% | View details | |
EL SALVADOR Larger sample | 72 | 1 | 71 | 1.4% | 98.6% | View details | |
RUSSIA Larger sample | 55 | 7 | 48 | 12.7% | 87.3% | View details | |
ROMANIA Larger sample | 41 | 0 | 41 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
UKRAINE Larger sample | 33 | 6 | 27 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
INDIA Larger sample | 31 | 1 | 30 | 3.2% | 96.8% | View details | |
SOMALIA Medium sample | 23 | 6 | 17 | 26.1% | 73.9% | View details | |
IRAN Medium sample | 20 | 2 | 18 | 10.0% | 90.0% | View details | |
FIJI Medium sample | 18 | 0 | 18 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
SRI LANKA Medium sample | 17 | 1 | 16 | 5.9% | 94.1% | View details | |
VIETNAM Medium sample | 17 | 0 | 17 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
HAITI Medium sample | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
BULGARIA Medium sample | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
HONDURAS Medium sample | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
ETHIOPIA Medium sample | 11 | 2 | 9 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
GAMBIA Medium sample | 11 | 2 | 9 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
CUBA Medium sample | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
LAOS Medium sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
PERU Medium sample | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details |
View details
CHINA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
82
Grants
9
Denials
73
Grant rate: 11.0%Denial rate: 89.0%
EL SALVADOR
Larger sampleTotal decisions
72
Grants
1
Denials
71
Grant rate: 1.4%Denial rate: 98.6%
RUSSIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
55
Grants
7
Denials
48
Grant rate: 12.7%Denial rate: 87.3%
ROMANIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
41
Grants
0
Denials
41
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
UKRAINE
Larger sampleTotal decisions
33
Grants
6
Denials
27
Grant rate: 18.2%Denial rate: 81.8%
INDIA
Larger sampleTotal decisions
31
Grants
1
Denials
30
Grant rate: 3.2%Denial rate: 96.8%
SOMALIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
23
Grants
6
Denials
17
Grant rate: 26.1%Denial rate: 73.9%
IRAN
Medium sampleTotal decisions
20
Grants
2
Denials
18
Grant rate: 10.0%Denial rate: 90.0%
FIJI
Medium sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
0
Denials
18
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
SRI LANKA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
1
Denials
16
Grant rate: 5.9%Denial rate: 94.1%
VIETNAM
Medium sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
0
Denials
17
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
HAITI
Medium sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
0
Denials
15
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
BULGARIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
0
Denials
12
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
HONDURAS
Medium sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
0
Denials
12
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
ETHIOPIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
2
Denials
9
Grant rate: 18.2%Denial rate: 81.8%
GAMBIA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
2
Denials
9
Grant rate: 18.2%Denial rate: 81.8%
CUBA
Medium sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
2
Denials
8
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
LAOS
Medium sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
PERU
Medium sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
2
Denials
8
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.