Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
79
Grants
5
Denials
74
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
5.9%
26 / 440
Total decisions
440
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
5.9%
Grants: 26
Denial rate
94.1%
Denials: 414
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Barr appointed Philip P. Taylor to begin hearing cases in January 2020. Judge Taylor earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1986 from Le Moyne College, a Juris Doctor in 1989 from Emory University School of Law, a Master of Judicial Studies in 2007 from University of Nevada, Reno, and a Doctor of Philosophy in Judicial Studies in 2012 from University of Nevada, Reno. From 2000 to 2019, Judge Taylor served as chief municipal judge for the City of Kennesaw, Acworth, Powder Springs, and Woodstock, Georgia. From 1996 to 2016, Judge Taylor served as magistrate judge, in Cobb County, Georgia. From 1989 to 2012, he was in private practice at Webb, Carlock, Copeland, Semler & Star; Hopkins & Taylor L.L.P.; and The Taylor Firm P.C. Judge Taylor is member of the Georgia State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Philip P Taylor.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 79 | 5 | 74 | 6.3% | 93.7% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 74 | 2 | 72 | 2.7% | 97.3% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 56 | 1 | 55 | 1.8% | 98.2% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 51 | 0 | 51 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 39 | 1 | 38 | 2.6% | 97.4% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 37 | 3 | 34 | 8.1% | 91.9% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 34 | 4 | 30 | 11.8% | 88.2% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Singapore Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Somalia Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Belize Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Guinea Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details |
Total decisions
79
Grants
5
Denials
74
Total decisions
74
Grants
2
Denials
72
Total decisions
56
Grants
1
Denials
55
Total decisions
51
Grants
0
Denials
51
Total decisions
39
Grants
1
Denials
38
Total decisions
37
Grants
3
Denials
34
Total decisions
34
Grants
4
Denials
30
Total decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.