India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
338
Grants
232
Denials
106
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
73.8%
1110 / 1503
Total decisions
1503
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
73.8%
Grants: 1110
Denial rate
26.1%
Denials: 393
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Arwen Ann Swink to begin hearing cases in February 2017. Judge Swink earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 2002 from California State University San Marcos and a Juris Doctor in 2006 from the University of California Hastings College Of Law. Prior to this post, she served as a staff attorney in the motions unit of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in San Francisco, beginning in 2010. From 2006 through 2010, she served as an associate attorney for the Law Office of Robert B. Jobe, in San Francisco. Judge Swink is a member of the State Bar of California.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Arwen A Swink.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
India Sufficient sample | 338 | 232 | 106 | 68.6% | 31.4% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 268 | 221 | 47 | 82.5% | 17.5% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 247 | 139 | 108 | 56.3% | 43.7% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 212 | 166 | 46 | 78.3% | 21.7% | View details | |
Nepal Sufficient sample | 71 | 59 | 12 | 83.1% | 16.9% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 69 | 57 | 12 | 82.6% | 17.4% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 52 | 44 | 8 | 84.6% | 15.4% | View details | |
Haiti Sufficient sample | 36 | 14 | 22 | 38.9% | 61.1% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 25 | 23 | 2 | 92.0% | 8.0% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 23 | 17 | 6 | 73.9% | 26.1% | View details | |
Belize Moderate sample | 12 | 12 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Romania Moderate sample | 12 | 10 | 2 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 11 | 11 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ukraine Moderate sample | 10 | 10 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 9 | 9 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Iraq Small sample | 9 | 9 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Philippines Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
338
Grants
232
Denials
106
Total decisions
268
Grants
221
Denials
47
Total decisions
247
Grants
139
Denials
108
Total decisions
212
Grants
166
Denials
46
Total decisions
71
Grants
59
Denials
12
Total decisions
69
Grants
57
Denials
12
Total decisions
52
Grants
44
Denials
8
Total decisions
36
Grants
14
Denials
22
Total decisions
25
Grants
23
Denials
2
Total decisions
23
Grants
17
Denials
6
Total decisions
12
Grants
12
Denials
0
Total decisions
12
Grants
10
Denials
2
Total decisions
11
Grants
11
Denials
0
Total decisions
10
Grants
10
Denials
0
Total decisions
9
Grants
9
Denials
0
Total decisions
9
Grants
9
Denials
0
Total decisions
6
Grants
3
Denials
3
Total decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.