India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
501
Grants
297
Denials
204
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
54.4%
686 / 1260
Total decisions
1260
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
54.4%
Grants: 686
Denial rate
45.6%
Denials: 574
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed Shadee M. Star to begin hearing cases in October 2018. Judge Star earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1996 from California State University, Fullerton,and a Juris Doctor in 1999 from Stetson University College of Law. From 2010 to 2018, she wasa senior attorney for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in Los Angeles. From 2003 to 2010, she was an assistant chief counsel for ICE,DHS, also in Los Angeles. From 2000 to 2003, she was an attorney with the Law Office of Machiavelli W. Chao in Irvine, California. Judge Star is a member of the State Bar of California.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Shadee M Star.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
India Sufficient sample | 501 | 297 | 204 | 59.3% | 40.7% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 171 | 46 | 125 | 26.9% | 73.1% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 166 | 100 | 66 | 60.2% | 39.8% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 101 | 42 | 59 | 41.6% | 58.4% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 52 | 25 | 27 | 48.1% | 51.9% | View details | |
Nepal Sufficient sample | 44 | 35 | 9 | 79.5% | 20.5% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 43 | 30 | 13 | 69.8% | 30.2% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 37 | 22 | 15 | 59.5% | 40.5% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 16 | 15 | 1 | 93.8% | 6.3% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 14 | 6 | 8 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 8 | 4 | 4 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 8 | 5 | 3 | 62.5% | 37.5% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Ukraine Small sample | 7 | 5 | 2 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Iraq Small sample | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details |
Total decisions
501
Grants
297
Denials
204
Total decisions
171
Grants
46
Denials
125
Total decisions
166
Grants
100
Denials
66
Total decisions
101
Grants
42
Denials
59
Total decisions
52
Grants
25
Denials
27
Total decisions
44
Grants
35
Denials
9
Total decisions
43
Grants
30
Denials
13
Total decisions
37
Grants
22
Denials
15
Total decisions
16
Grants
15
Denials
1
Total decisions
14
Grants
6
Denials
8
Total decisions
8
Grants
4
Denials
4
Total decisions
8
Grants
5
Denials
3
Total decisions
7
Grants
3
Denials
4
Total decisions
7
Grants
5
Denials
2
Total decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Total decisions
6
Grants
5
Denials
1
Total decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.