Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
568
Grants
466
Denials
102
Grant rate: 82.0%Denial rate: 18.0%
Immigration judge
Jem C Sponzo
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
63.6%
1121 / 1763
Total decisions
1763
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
63.6%
Grants: 1121
Denial rate
36.4%
Denials: 642
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Jem C. Sponzo to begin hearing cases in February 2017. Judge Sponzo earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 2003 from Hamilton College and a Juris Doctor in 2006 from the University of Connecticut School of Law. From 2007 to January 2017, she served as a trial attorney for the Civil Division, Office of Immigration Litigation, Department of Justice (DOJ), in Washington, D.C. From January 2015 to July 2015, she also served as a clearance counsel for the Office of Presidential Personnel, White House, Executive Office of the President of the United States. From 2006 through 2007, she served as a judicial law clerk for the New York City Immigration Court, Executive Office for Immigration Review, DOJ, entering on duty through the Attorney General’s Honors Program. Judge Sponzo is a member of the New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants1121 / 1763
Denials642 / 1763
Other relief0 / 1763
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Jem C Sponzo.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 568 | 466 | 102 | 82.0% | 18.0% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 211 | 159 | 52 | 75.4% | 24.6% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 140 | 32 | 108 | 22.9% | 77.1% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 108 | 86 | 22 | 79.6% | 20.4% | View details | |
Nepal Sufficient sample | 90 | 63 | 27 | 70.0% | 30.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 80 | 7 | 73 | 8.8% | 91.3% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 80 | 24 | 56 | 30.0% | 70.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 72 | 9 | 63 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 44 | 19 | 25 | 43.2% | 56.8% | View details | |
Former Countries Sufficient sample | 42 | 37 | 5 | 88.1% | 11.9% | View details | |
Pakistan Moderate sample | 23 | 19 | 4 | 82.6% | 17.4% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 21 | 4 | 17 | 19.0% | 81.0% | View details | |
Georgia Moderate sample | 19 | 10 | 9 | 52.6% | 47.4% | View details | |
Albania Moderate sample | 18 | 17 | 1 | 94.4% | 5.6% | View details | |
Bolivia Moderate sample | 17 | 14 | 3 | 82.4% | 17.6% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 15 | 2 | 13 | 13.3% | 86.7% | View details | |
Guinea Moderate sample | 15 | 10 | 5 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 15 | 4 | 11 | 26.7% | 73.3% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 11 | 10 | 1 | 90.9% | 9.1% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 11 | 6 | 5 | 54.5% | 45.5% | View details |
View details
India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
211
Grants
159
Denials
52
Grant rate: 75.4%Denial rate: 24.6%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
140
Grants
32
Denials
108
Grant rate: 22.9%Denial rate: 77.1%
Bulgaria
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
108
Grants
86
Denials
22
Grant rate: 79.6%Denial rate: 20.4%
Nepal
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
90
Grants
63
Denials
27
Grant rate: 70.0%Denial rate: 30.0%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
80
Grants
7
Denials
73
Grant rate: 8.8%Denial rate: 91.3%
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
80
Grants
24
Denials
56
Grant rate: 30.0%Denial rate: 70.0%
Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
72
Grants
9
Denials
63
Grant rate: 12.5%Denial rate: 87.5%
Russia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
44
Grants
19
Denials
25
Grant rate: 43.2%Denial rate: 56.8%
Former Countries
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
42
Grants
37
Denials
5
Grant rate: 88.1%Denial rate: 11.9%
Pakistan
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
23
Grants
19
Denials
4
Grant rate: 82.6%Denial rate: 17.4%
Mexico
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
21
Grants
4
Denials
17
Grant rate: 19.0%Denial rate: 81.0%
Georgia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
19
Grants
10
Denials
9
Grant rate: 52.6%Denial rate: 47.4%
Albania
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
17
Denials
1
Grant rate: 94.4%Denial rate: 5.6%
Bolivia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
14
Denials
3
Grant rate: 82.4%Denial rate: 17.6%
Colombia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
2
Denials
13
Grant rate: 13.3%Denial rate: 86.7%
Guinea
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
10
Denials
5
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Uzbekistan
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
4
Denials
11
Grant rate: 26.7%Denial rate: 73.3%
Nicaragua
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
10
Denials
1
Grant rate: 90.9%Denial rate: 9.1%
Venezuela
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
6
Denials
5
Grant rate: 54.5%Denial rate: 45.5%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Lori Adams
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 79.5%
- Denial Rate
- 20.5%
Matthew T. Adrian
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 51.3%
- Denial Rate
- 48.7%
H. Jere Armstrong
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 33.3%
- Denial Rate
- 66.7%
Terry A. Bain
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 87.6%
- Denial Rate
- 12.4%
Susan M Beschta
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 81.3%
- Denial Rate
- 18.8%
Noel A Brennan
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 87.6%
- Denial Rate
- 12.4%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.