Ethiopia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
430
Grants
398
Denials
32
Grant rate: 92.6%Denial rate: 7.4%
Immigration judge
Thomas G Snow
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
54.8%
1096 / 2000
Total decisions
2000
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
54.8%
Grants: 1096
Denial rate
45.2%
Denials: 904
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Judge Snow was appointed as an Immigration Judge in October 2005. He received a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1977 from the College of William and Mary, a Master of Arts degree in 1980 and a Juris Doctorate in 1982, both from the University of Virginia. From 1991 to October 2005, Judge Snow served as principal deputy director for the Office of International Affairs, Criminal Division, Department of Justice (DOJ). He also worked as an adjunct professor of law at the University of Virginia Law School from 1995 to 2005 where he taught international criminal law. In 1989, Judge Snow served as an attorney advisor in the Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State. He was a trial attorney from 1984 to 1989 in the Office of International Affairs, Criminal Division, DOJ. Judge Snow served as a trial attorney in the voting section of the Civil Rights Division, Department of Justice, DOJ, from 1982 to 1984. He is a member of the District of Columbia and Virginia Bars.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants1096 / 2000
Denials904 / 2000
Other relief0 / 2000
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Thomas G Snow.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ethiopia Sufficient sample | 430 | 398 | 32 | 92.6% | 7.4% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 322 | 87 | 235 | 27.0% | 73.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Sufficient sample | 117 | 107 | 10 | 91.5% | 8.5% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 112 | 38 | 74 | 33.9% | 66.1% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 104 | 26 | 78 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 101 | 68 | 33 | 67.3% | 32.7% | View details | |
Mauritania Sufficient sample | 76 | 11 | 65 | 14.5% | 85.5% | View details | |
Eritrea Sufficient sample | 68 | 62 | 6 | 91.2% | 8.8% | View details | |
Pakistan Sufficient sample | 36 | 21 | 15 | 58.3% | 41.7% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 32 | 16 | 16 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 28 | 2 | 26 | 7.1% | 92.9% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 27 | 24 | 3 | 88.9% | 11.1% | View details | |
Iran Moderate sample | 22 | 18 | 4 | 81.8% | 18.2% | View details | |
Guinea Moderate sample | 20 | 8 | 12 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Egypt Moderate sample | 18 | 15 | 3 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Madagascar Moderate sample | 17 | 1 | 16 | 5.9% | 94.1% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 17 | 9 | 8 | 52.9% | 47.1% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 15 | 8 | 7 | 53.3% | 46.7% | View details | |
Central African Republic Moderate sample | 13 | 8 | 5 | 61.5% | 38.5% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
322
Grants
87
Denials
235
Grant rate: 27.0%Denial rate: 73.0%
Cameroon
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
117
Grants
107
Denials
10
Grant rate: 91.5%Denial rate: 8.5%
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
112
Grants
38
Denials
74
Grant rate: 33.9%Denial rate: 66.1%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
104
Grants
26
Denials
78
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
101
Grants
68
Denials
33
Grant rate: 67.3%Denial rate: 32.7%
Mauritania
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
76
Grants
11
Denials
65
Grant rate: 14.5%Denial rate: 85.5%
Eritrea
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
68
Grants
62
Denials
6
Grant rate: 91.2%Denial rate: 8.8%
Pakistan
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
36
Grants
21
Denials
15
Grant rate: 58.3%Denial rate: 41.7%
Russia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
32
Grants
16
Denials
16
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Mexico
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
28
Grants
2
Denials
26
Grant rate: 7.1%Denial rate: 92.9%
Russia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
27
Grants
24
Denials
3
Grant rate: 88.9%Denial rate: 11.1%
Iran
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
18
Denials
4
Grant rate: 81.8%Denial rate: 18.2%
Guinea
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
20
Grants
8
Denials
12
Grant rate: 40.0%Denial rate: 60.0%
Egypt
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
15
Denials
3
Grant rate: 83.3%Denial rate: 16.7%
Madagascar
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
1
Denials
16
Grant rate: 5.9%Denial rate: 94.1%
Uzbekistan
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
17
Grants
9
Denials
8
Grant rate: 52.9%Denial rate: 47.1%
Nepal
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
8
Denials
7
Grant rate: 53.3%Denial rate: 46.7%
Central African Republic
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
8
Denials
5
Grant rate: 61.5%Denial rate: 38.5%
Colombia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
0
Denials
13
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Quynh Vu Bain
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 31.1%
- Denial Rate
- 68.9%
John C Barnes
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 19.9%
- Denial Rate
- 80.0%
Denise G. Brown
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 0.0%
- Denial Rate
- 100.0%
John Milo Bryant
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 39.2%
- Denial Rate
- 60.8%
Lawrence O Burman
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 58.9%
- Denial Rate
- 41.1%
Raphael Choi
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 21.6%
- Denial Rate
- 78.4%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.