India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
130
Grants
82
Denials
48
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
61.9%
378 / 611
Total decisions
611
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
61.9%
Grants: 378
Denial rate
38.1%
Denials: 233
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Michelle A. Slayton was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in February 2023. Judge Slayton earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1994 from the University of Oregon and a Juris Doctor in 1999 from New England School of Law. From 2010 to 2022, she served as an assistant chief counsel with the Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Portland, Oregon. From 2007 to 2010, she was a solo practitioner representing noncitizens in Portland, Oregon. In 2007, she was a contract attorney in the business immigration division of Tonkon Torp LLP in Portland. From 2002 to 2004, she practiced immigration law with the Law Office of Claudia Slovinsky PLLC in New York City. From 2001 to 2002, she was an associate in the business immigration division of Epstein, Becker & Green PC in New York. From 2000 to 2001, she served as an attorney advisor at the New York Immigration Court, entering on duty through the Attorney General’s Honors Program. From 1999 to 2000, she served as a judicial law clerk with the Family & Probate Court of Massachusetts in Boston. Judge Slayton is a member of the New York State Bar and the Oregon State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Michelle A Slayton.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
India Sufficient sample | 130 | 82 | 48 | 63.1% | 36.9% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 97 | 68 | 29 | 70.1% | 29.9% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 96 | 22 | 74 | 22.9% | 77.1% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 50 | 28 | 22 | 56.0% | 44.0% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 24 | 24 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 23 | 12 | 11 | 52.2% | 47.8% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 23 | 14 | 9 | 60.9% | 39.1% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 19 | 12 | 7 | 63.2% | 36.8% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 18 | 10 | 8 | 55.6% | 44.4% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 17 | 15 | 2 | 88.2% | 11.8% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 12 | 11 | 1 | 91.7% | 8.3% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 11 | 8 | 3 | 72.7% | 27.3% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 9 | 5 | 4 | 55.6% | 44.4% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 8 | 6 | 2 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Syria Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
130
Grants
82
Denials
48
Total decisions
97
Grants
68
Denials
29
Total decisions
96
Grants
22
Denials
74
Total decisions
50
Grants
28
Denials
22
Total decisions
24
Grants
24
Denials
0
Total decisions
23
Grants
12
Denials
11
Total decisions
23
Grants
14
Denials
9
Total decisions
19
Grants
12
Denials
7
Total decisions
18
Grants
10
Denials
8
Total decisions
17
Grants
15
Denials
2
Total decisions
12
Grants
11
Denials
1
Total decisions
11
Grants
8
Denials
3
Total decisions
9
Grants
5
Denials
4
Total decisions
8
Grants
6
Denials
2
Total decisions
7
Grants
4
Denials
3
Total decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
3
Denials
1
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.