Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
175
Grants
86
Denials
89
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
57.6%
151 / 262
Total decisions
262
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
57.6%
Grants: 151
Denial rate
42.4%
Denials: 111
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Michael P. Sady was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in May 2022. Judge Sady earned a Bachelor of Science in 1984 from Northeastern University and a Juris Doctor in 1988 from Boston University School of Law. From 2002 to 2022, he served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) in the District of Massachusetts, Boston. From 1997 to 2002, he served as Senior Litigation Counsel with the Massachusetts Port Authority in Boston. From 1991 to 1997, he served as an Associate Litigation Attorney at Eckert, Seamans, Cherin & Mellott in Boston. From 1990 to 1991, he served as an Associate Litigation Attorney at Hutchins & Wheeler in Boston. From 1988 to 1990, he served as an Associate Litigation Attorney at Peabody & Arnold in Boston. Judge Sady is a member of the Massachusetts Bar, as well as the First and Second Circuit Courts of Appeal.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Michael Sady.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brazil Sufficient sample | 175 | 86 | 89 | 49.1% | 50.9% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 33 | 25 | 8 | 75.8% | 24.2% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 17 | 6 | 11 | 35.3% | 64.7% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 11 | 11 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 8 | 6 | 2 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Bolivia Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Angola Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Belgium Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Mexico Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Singapore Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
South Africa Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | View details | |
Central African Republic Small sample | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | View details | |
Chad Small sample | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | View details | |
Côte d’Ivoire Small sample | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | View details |
Total decisions
175
Grants
86
Denials
89
Total decisions
33
Grants
25
Denials
8
Total decisions
17
Grants
6
Denials
11
Total decisions
11
Grants
11
Denials
0
Total decisions
8
Grants
6
Denials
2
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
0
Grants
0
Denials
0
Total decisions
0
Grants
0
Denials
0
Total decisions
0
Grants
0
Denials
0
Total decisions
0
Grants
0
Denials
0
Total decisions
0
Grants
0
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.