Guatemala
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
23
Grants
12
Denials
11
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
58.3%
70 / 120
Total decisions
120
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
58.3%
Grants: 70
Denial rate
41.7%
Denials: 50
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Barr appointed Marna M. Rusher to begin hearing cases in January 2020. Judge Rusher earned a Bachelor of Science in 1972 from the University of Bridgeport and a Juris Doctor in 2001 from the University of Syracuse, School of Law. From 2007 to 2019, she served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Boston. From 2005 to 2007, she was a civil litigation associate for Murphy & Riley P.C. From 2002 to 2005, she served as an assistant district attorney, in Middlesex County, Massachusetts. Judge Rusher is a member of the Massachusetts State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Marna M Rusher.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guatemala Moderate sample | 23 | 12 | 11 | 52.2% | 47.8% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 23 | 18 | 5 | 78.3% | 21.7% | View details | |
Angola Moderate sample | 11 | 6 | 5 | 54.5% | 45.5% | View details | |
Honduras Small sample | 9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details | |
Uganda Small sample | 9 | 6 | 3 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Central African Republic Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Ukraine Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Belarus Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Iraq Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
23
Grants
12
Denials
11
Total decisions
23
Grants
18
Denials
5
Total decisions
11
Grants
6
Denials
5
Total decisions
9
Grants
7
Denials
2
Total decisions
9
Grants
6
Denials
3
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.