Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
157
Grants
26
Denials
131
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
38.5%
100 / 260
Total decisions
260
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
38.5%
Grants: 100
Denial rate
61.5%
Denials: 160
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Adrian N. Roe was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in May 2023. Judge Roe received a Bachelor of Arts in 1981 from The Johns Hopkins University and a Juris Doctor in 1984 from Boston University School of Law. From 1991 to 2023, he practiced as a general litigation attorney with various law firms in Pittsburgh to include most recently Roe & Simon LLC. From 1986 to 1991, he was an associate attorney with Wilmer Cutler & Pickering LLP in Washington, D.C. From 1984 to 1986, he was a judicial law clerk for the Honorable Thomas D. Lambros of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. Judge Roe is a member of the Pennsylvania Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Adrian N Roe.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brazil Sufficient sample | 157 | 26 | 131 | 16.6% | 83.4% | View details | |
Angola Moderate sample | 19 | 12 | 7 | 63.2% | 36.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 19 | 14 | 5 | 73.7% | 26.3% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 14 | 8 | 6 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 13 | 12 | 1 | 92.3% | 7.7% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 11 | 6 | 5 | 54.5% | 45.5% | View details | |
Central African Republic Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Uganda Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Democratic Republic Of Congo Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Honduras Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Djibouti Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Kenya Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Somalia Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Syria Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | View details |
Total decisions
157
Grants
26
Denials
131
Total decisions
19
Grants
12
Denials
7
Total decisions
19
Grants
14
Denials
5
Total decisions
14
Grants
8
Denials
6
Total decisions
13
Grants
12
Denials
1
Total decisions
11
Grants
6
Denials
5
Total decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Total decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
0
Grants
0
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.