Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
106
Grants
0
Denials
106
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
7.7%
53 / 686
Total decisions
686
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
7.7%
Grants: 53
Denial rate
92.3%
Denials: 633
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
James F. Polivka was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in February 2023. Judge Polivka earned a Bachelor of Science in 2007 from Ohio State University, Max M. Fisher College of Business, and a Juris Doctor in 2012 from Cleveland State University, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law. From 2014 to 2022, he served as an assistant chief counsel with the Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in Atlanta, San Francisco, and Oakdale, Louisiana. From 2013 to 2014, he served as an immigration services officer with the National Benefits Center, Field Operations Division, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, DHS, in Overland Park, Kansas. Judge Polivka is a member of the Missouri Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to James F Polivka.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 106 | 0 | 106 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 102 | 12 | 90 | 11.8% | 88.2% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 79 | 28 | 51 | 35.4% | 64.6% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 62 | 0 | 62 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 45 | 1 | 44 | 2.2% | 97.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 41 | 0 | 41 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 37 | 0 | 37 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Georgia Moderate sample | 22 | 0 | 22 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 19 | 1 | 18 | 5.3% | 94.7% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 17 | 0 | 17 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 10 | 4 | 6 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 8 | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | 87.5% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
India Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Tristan da Cunha Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
106
Grants
0
Denials
106
Total decisions
102
Grants
12
Denials
90
Total decisions
79
Grants
28
Denials
51
Total decisions
62
Grants
0
Denials
62
Total decisions
45
Grants
1
Denials
44
Total decisions
41
Grants
0
Denials
41
Total decisions
37
Grants
0
Denials
37
Total decisions
22
Grants
0
Denials
22
Total decisions
21
Grants
0
Denials
21
Total decisions
19
Grants
1
Denials
18
Total decisions
17
Grants
0
Denials
17
Total decisions
11
Grants
0
Denials
11
Total decisions
10
Grants
4
Denials
6
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Total decisions
8
Grants
1
Denials
7
Total decisions
7
Grants
1
Denials
6
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.