Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
196
Grants
4
Denials
192
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
14.0%
120 / 858
Total decisions
858
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
14.0%
Grants: 120
Denial rate
86.0%
Denials: 738
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Barr appointed Christopher V. Phan to begin hearing cases in January 2020. Judge Phan earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1996 from Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, and a Juris Doctor in 1999 from Southern Illinois University. From 2000 to 2019, he served as a judge advocate for the U.S. Navy in the following locations: Earle, New Jersey; Yokosuka, Japan; San Diego, California; Portsmouth, Virginia; The Pentagon, District of Columbia; Fort Worth, Texas; and Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. From 2012 to 2016, he served as a city council member, in Garden Grove, California, and as deputy district attorney, in Orange County, California. He is currently a commander in the U.S. Navy Reserve. Judge Phan is a member of the California State Bar, State Bar of Illinois, and State Bar of Texas.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Christopher Phan.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 196 | 4 | 192 | 2.0% | 98.0% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 147 | 1 | 146 | 0.7% | 99.3% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 130 | 0 | 130 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 59 | 5 | 54 | 8.5% | 91.5% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 51 | 27 | 24 | 52.9% | 47.1% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 40 | 21 | 19 | 52.5% | 47.5% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 38 | 0 | 38 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 38 | 20 | 18 | 52.6% | 47.4% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 32 | 20 | 12 | 62.5% | 37.5% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 15 | 8 | 7 | 53.3% | 46.7% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 15 | 2 | 13 | 13.3% | 86.7% | View details | |
Pakistan Moderate sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Georgia Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Iraq Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Singapore Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
196
Grants
4
Denials
192
Total decisions
147
Grants
1
Denials
146
Total decisions
130
Grants
0
Denials
130
Total decisions
59
Grants
5
Denials
54
Total decisions
51
Grants
27
Denials
24
Total decisions
40
Grants
21
Denials
19
Total decisions
38
Grants
0
Denials
38
Total decisions
38
Grants
20
Denials
18
Total decisions
32
Grants
20
Denials
12
Total decisions
15
Grants
8
Denials
7
Total decisions
15
Grants
2
Denials
13
Total decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.