Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
226
Grants
4
Denials
222
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
18.9%
215 / 1138
Total decisions
1138
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
18.9%
Grants: 215
Denial rate
81.1%
Denials: 923
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Tiesha R. Peal was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in October 2022. Judge Peal earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1999 from Syracuse University and Juris Doctor in 2004 from Rutgers-Newark School of Law. From 2016 to 2022, she served as an assistant district attorney at the Bronx District Attorney’s Office. From 2014 to 2016, she was a staff attorney at District Council 37 Municipal Employees Legal Services. From 2006 to 2014, she was a staff attorney at Essex-Newark Legal Services. Judge Peal is a member of the New York State Bar and the New Jersey State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Tiesha Peal.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 226 | 4 | 222 | 1.8% | 98.2% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 179 | 58 | 121 | 32.4% | 67.6% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 94 | 7 | 87 | 7.4% | 92.6% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 88 | 12 | 76 | 13.6% | 86.4% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 81 | 39 | 42 | 48.1% | 51.9% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 62 | 12 | 50 | 19.4% | 80.6% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 50 | 0 | 50 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 37 | 2 | 35 | 5.4% | 94.6% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 30 | 6 | 24 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 29 | 9 | 20 | 31.0% | 69.0% | View details | |
Guinea Moderate sample | 19 | 4 | 15 | 21.1% | 78.9% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 17 | 1 | 16 | 5.9% | 94.1% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 16 | 0 | 16 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Georgia Moderate sample | 15 | 9 | 6 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Singapore Moderate sample | 14 | 2 | 12 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Jamaica Moderate sample | 12 | 4 | 8 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 12 | 3 | 9 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Moderate sample | 11 | 1 | 10 | 9.1% | 90.9% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bolivia Small sample | 9 | 5 | 4 | 55.6% | 44.4% | View details |
Total decisions
226
Grants
4
Denials
222
Total decisions
179
Grants
58
Denials
121
Total decisions
94
Grants
7
Denials
87
Total decisions
88
Grants
12
Denials
76
Total decisions
81
Grants
39
Denials
42
Total decisions
62
Grants
12
Denials
50
Total decisions
50
Grants
0
Denials
50
Total decisions
37
Grants
2
Denials
35
Total decisions
30
Grants
6
Denials
24
Total decisions
29
Grants
9
Denials
20
Total decisions
19
Grants
4
Denials
15
Total decisions
17
Grants
1
Denials
16
Total decisions
16
Grants
0
Denials
16
Total decisions
15
Grants
9
Denials
6
Total decisions
14
Grants
2
Denials
12
Total decisions
12
Grants
4
Denials
8
Total decisions
12
Grants
3
Denials
9
Total decisions
11
Grants
1
Denials
10
Total decisions
11
Grants
0
Denials
11
Total decisions
9
Grants
5
Denials
4
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.