Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
323
Grants
37
Denials
286
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
16.8%
171 / 1017
Total decisions
1017
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
16.8%
Grants: 171
Denial rate
83.2%
Denials: 846
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William Bar appointed Bao Q. Nguyen to begin hearing cases in October 2019.Judge Nguyen earned a Bachelor of Science in 2001 from the University of Maryland, College Park, and a Juris Doctor in 2005 from Temple University School of Law. From 2016 to 2019, heserved as an assistant chief counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in San Antonio and Pearsall, Texas.From 2013 to 2016, he was an attorney for Margaret W. Wong & Associates, in Cleveland. From 2007 to 2013, he was an attorney for Reza Athari & Associates, in Las Vegas and Salt Lake City.In 2006, he was an attorney for Law Offices of Tahir Mella, in Philadelphia. Judge Nguyen is amember of the Pennsylvania State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Bao Q Nguyen.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 323 | 37 | 286 | 11.5% | 88.5% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 187 | 24 | 163 | 12.8% | 87.2% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 120 | 2 | 118 | 1.7% | 98.3% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 100 | 3 | 97 | 3.0% | 97.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 91 | 44 | 47 | 48.4% | 51.6% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 46 | 23 | 23 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 33 | 1 | 32 | 3.0% | 97.0% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 32 | 14 | 18 | 43.8% | 56.3% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 11 | 7 | 4 | 63.6% | 36.4% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 8 | 3 | 5 | 37.5% | 62.5% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Nepal Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Moldova Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
323
Grants
37
Denials
286
Total decisions
187
Grants
24
Denials
163
Total decisions
120
Grants
2
Denials
118
Total decisions
100
Grants
3
Denials
97
Total decisions
91
Grants
44
Denials
47
Total decisions
46
Grants
23
Denials
23
Total decisions
33
Grants
1
Denials
32
Total decisions
32
Grants
14
Denials
18
Total decisions
11
Grants
7
Denials
4
Total decisions
10
Grants
0
Denials
10
Total decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Total decisions
8
Grants
3
Denials
5
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
3
Denials
2
Total decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Total decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.