Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
288
Grants
122
Denials
166
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
42.8%
365 / 852
Total decisions
852
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
42.8%
Grants: 365
Denial rate
57.2%
Denials: 487
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Holder appointed Deepali Nadkarni in March 2011. She received a bachelor of arts degree in 1991 from Mercer University in Macon, Ga., and a juris doctorate in 1994 from Emory University School of Law. From October 1995 to March 2011, Judge Nadkarni served at the Board of Immigration Appeals, Executive Office for Immigration Review, in various capacities, including attorney advisor, supervisory attorney-examiner, and senior panel attorney. From 1994 to 1995, she worked as a judicial law clerk entering on duty through the Attorney General's Honors Program. Judge Nadkarni is a member of the State Bar of Georgia.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Deepali Nadkarni.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 288 | 122 | 166 | 42.4% | 57.6% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 170 | 71 | 99 | 41.8% | 58.2% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 81 | 34 | 47 | 42.0% | 58.0% | View details | |
St. Barthélemy Sufficient sample | 52 | 5 | 47 | 9.6% | 90.4% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 40 | 8 | 32 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Moderate sample | 24 | 22 | 2 | 91.7% | 8.3% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 21 | 8 | 13 | 38.1% | 61.9% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 18 | 3 | 15 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 17 | 17 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Moderate sample | 11 | 6 | 5 | 54.5% | 45.5% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 11 | 5 | 6 | 45.5% | 54.5% | View details | |
Mauritania Moderate sample | 11 | 5 | 6 | 45.5% | 54.5% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 11 | 4 | 7 | 36.4% | 63.6% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 8 | 8 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 8 | 6 | 2 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
288
Grants
122
Denials
166
Total decisions
170
Grants
71
Denials
99
Total decisions
81
Grants
34
Denials
47
Total decisions
52
Grants
5
Denials
47
Total decisions
40
Grants
8
Denials
32
Total decisions
24
Grants
22
Denials
2
Total decisions
21
Grants
8
Denials
13
Total decisions
18
Grants
3
Denials
15
Total decisions
17
Grants
17
Denials
0
Total decisions
11
Grants
6
Denials
5
Total decisions
11
Grants
5
Denials
6
Total decisions
11
Grants
5
Denials
6
Total decisions
11
Grants
4
Denials
7
Total decisions
8
Grants
8
Denials
0
Total decisions
8
Grants
6
Denials
2
Total decisions
7
Grants
1
Denials
6
Total decisions
7
Grants
3
Denials
4
Total decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
3
Denials
1
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.