Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
340
Grants
138
Denials
202
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
39.1%
450 / 1151
Total decisions
1151
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
39.1%
Grants: 450
Denial rate
60.9%
Denials: 701
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed Francisco Mendez to begin hearing cases in October 2018. Judge Mendez earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1992 from Fordham University and a Juris Doctor in 1995 from Fordham Law School. From 2011 to 2018, he was an administrative judgefor the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals, Department of Defense (DOD), in Arlington,Virginia. From 2003 to 2011, he was a trial attorney for DOD, also in Arlington. From 1996 to 2016, he served as a judge advocate in the U.S. Air Force, six years on active duty and 14 yearsin the reserves. Judge Mendez is a member of the New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Francisco Mendez.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 340 | 138 | 202 | 40.6% | 59.4% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 209 | 54 | 155 | 25.8% | 74.2% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 124 | 12 | 112 | 9.7% | 90.3% | View details | |
St. Barthélemy Sufficient sample | 70 | 6 | 64 | 8.6% | 91.4% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 40 | 20 | 20 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 37 | 3 | 34 | 8.1% | 91.9% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 31 | 3 | 28 | 9.7% | 90.3% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 29 | 16 | 13 | 55.2% | 44.8% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 27 | 23 | 4 | 85.2% | 14.8% | View details | |
Ethiopia Moderate sample | 26 | 24 | 2 | 92.3% | 7.7% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 25 | 23 | 2 | 92.0% | 8.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Moderate sample | 24 | 22 | 2 | 91.7% | 8.3% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 22 | 11 | 11 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 13 | 11 | 2 | 84.6% | 15.4% | View details | |
Mauritania Moderate sample | 13 | 2 | 11 | 15.4% | 84.6% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 12 | 12 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 8 | 8 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
India Small sample | 7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | 57.1% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 7 | 5 | 2 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details |
Total decisions
340
Grants
138
Denials
202
Total decisions
209
Grants
54
Denials
155
Total decisions
124
Grants
12
Denials
112
Total decisions
70
Grants
6
Denials
64
Total decisions
40
Grants
20
Denials
20
Total decisions
37
Grants
3
Denials
34
Total decisions
31
Grants
3
Denials
28
Total decisions
29
Grants
16
Denials
13
Total decisions
27
Grants
23
Denials
4
Total decisions
26
Grants
24
Denials
2
Total decisions
25
Grants
23
Denials
2
Total decisions
24
Grants
22
Denials
2
Total decisions
22
Grants
11
Denials
11
Total decisions
13
Grants
11
Denials
2
Total decisions
13
Grants
2
Denials
11
Total decisions
12
Grants
12
Denials
0
Total decisions
8
Grants
8
Denials
0
Total decisions
7
Grants
4
Denials
3
Total decisions
7
Grants
3
Denials
4
Total decisions
7
Grants
5
Denials
2
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.