Russia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
80
Grants
43
Denials
37
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
34.1%
233 / 684
Total decisions
684
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
34.1%
Grants: 233
Denial rate
65.9%
Denials: 451
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Ana M. Mencini was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in October 2022. Judge Mencini earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1990 from Lake Forest College, a Master of Arts in 1993 from De Paul University, and a Juris Doctor in 2001 from Chicago-Kent College of Law. From 2014 to 2022, she was in private practice at the law offices of Ana M. Mencini & Associates PC in Itasca, Illinois. From 2011 to 2014, she was an assistant clinical professor of law at Chicago- Kent College of Law in Chicago, Illinois. From 2004 to 2011, she was in private practice at the law offices of Ana M. Mencini & Associates PC. From 2002 to 2004, she was an associate attorney with A. Traub & Cadiz PC in Lombard, Illinois. From 2001 to 2004, she was a legal editor with Lexis-Nexis. Judge Mencini is a member of the Illinois State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Ana Mencini.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Russia Sufficient sample | 80 | 43 | 37 | 53.8% | 46.3% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 71 | 8 | 63 | 11.3% | 88.7% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 70 | 34 | 36 | 48.6% | 51.4% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 69 | 36 | 33 | 52.2% | 47.8% | View details | |
Kyrgyzstan Sufficient sample | 57 | 15 | 42 | 26.3% | 73.7% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 50 | 3 | 47 | 6.0% | 94.0% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 45 | 9 | 36 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 38 | 0 | 38 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 30 | 5 | 25 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 19 | 7 | 12 | 36.8% | 63.2% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 13 | 1 | 12 | 7.7% | 92.3% | View details | |
Belize Moderate sample | 12 | 11 | 1 | 91.7% | 8.3% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Tristan da Cunha Moderate sample | 10 | 10 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 8 | 5 | 3 | 62.5% | 37.5% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 7 | 6 | 1 | 85.7% | 14.3% | View details | |
Argentina Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details |
Total decisions
80
Grants
43
Denials
37
Total decisions
71
Grants
8
Denials
63
Total decisions
70
Grants
34
Denials
36
Total decisions
69
Grants
36
Denials
33
Total decisions
57
Grants
15
Denials
42
Total decisions
50
Grants
3
Denials
47
Total decisions
45
Grants
9
Denials
36
Total decisions
38
Grants
0
Denials
38
Total decisions
30
Grants
5
Denials
25
Total decisions
19
Grants
7
Denials
12
Total decisions
13
Grants
1
Denials
12
Total decisions
12
Grants
11
Denials
1
Total decisions
10
Grants
2
Denials
8
Total decisions
10
Grants
10
Denials
0
Total decisions
8
Grants
5
Denials
3
Total decisions
7
Grants
6
Denials
1
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
4
Denials
1
Total decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Total decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.