Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
434
Grants
347
Denials
87
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
56.7%
923 / 1628
Total decisions
1628
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
56.7%
Grants: 923
Denial rate
43.3%
Denials: 705
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed Michael G. Mc Farland to begin hearing cases in August 2018. Judge Mc Farland earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 2004from New York University and a Juris Doctor in 2007from New York University School of Law. From 2011 to 2018, he was assistant chief counsel and then deputy chief counsel for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in New York, N.Y. From 2007 to 2011, he wasa staff attorney with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, also in New York, N.Y.Judge Mc Farland is a member of the New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Michael G McFarland.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 434 | 347 | 87 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 193 | 121 | 72 | 62.7% | 37.3% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 147 | 19 | 128 | 12.9% | 87.1% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 114 | 85 | 29 | 74.6% | 25.4% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 84 | 21 | 63 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 82 | 11 | 71 | 13.4% | 86.6% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 71 | 14 | 57 | 19.7% | 80.3% | View details | |
Nepal Sufficient sample | 54 | 40 | 14 | 74.1% | 25.9% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 42 | 37 | 5 | 88.1% | 11.9% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 42 | 13 | 29 | 31.0% | 69.0% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Sufficient sample | 34 | 23 | 11 | 67.6% | 32.4% | View details | |
Albania Moderate sample | 28 | 26 | 2 | 92.9% | 7.1% | View details | |
Georgia Moderate sample | 23 | 13 | 10 | 56.5% | 43.5% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 18 | 5 | 13 | 27.8% | 72.2% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 18 | 13 | 5 | 72.2% | 27.8% | View details | |
Guinea Moderate sample | 17 | 7 | 10 | 41.2% | 58.8% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 15 | 2 | 13 | 13.3% | 86.7% | View details | |
Kazakhstan Moderate sample | 13 | 12 | 1 | 92.3% | 7.7% | View details | |
Mauritania Moderate sample | 12 | 3 | 9 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Moderate sample | 11 | 8 | 3 | 72.7% | 27.3% | View details |
Total decisions
434
Grants
347
Denials
87
Total decisions
193
Grants
121
Denials
72
Total decisions
147
Grants
19
Denials
128
Total decisions
114
Grants
85
Denials
29
Total decisions
84
Grants
21
Denials
63
Total decisions
82
Grants
11
Denials
71
Total decisions
71
Grants
14
Denials
57
Total decisions
54
Grants
40
Denials
14
Total decisions
42
Grants
37
Denials
5
Total decisions
42
Grants
13
Denials
29
Total decisions
34
Grants
23
Denials
11
Total decisions
28
Grants
26
Denials
2
Total decisions
23
Grants
13
Denials
10
Total decisions
18
Grants
5
Denials
13
Total decisions
18
Grants
13
Denials
5
Total decisions
17
Grants
7
Denials
10
Total decisions
15
Grants
2
Denials
13
Total decisions
13
Grants
12
Denials
1
Total decisions
12
Grants
3
Denials
9
Total decisions
11
Grants
8
Denials
3
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.