Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
59
Grants
0
Denials
59
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
5.0%
21 / 420
Total decisions
420
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
5.0%
Grants: 21
Denial rate
95.0%
Denials: 399
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William Barr appointed Christina M. Martyak to begin hearing cases in October 2019. Judge Martyak earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1989 from Boston College, a Mastersof Arts in 2000 from Ball State University, and a Juris Doctor in 2000 from St. Thomas University. From 2006 to 2019, she served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of Chief Counsel,Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Miami. From 2005 to 2006, she served as an assistant statewide prosecutor for the Florida Office of the Attorney General, in Miami. From 2000 to 2004, she served as an assistant state attorney for the Miami-Dade State Attorney’s Office, in Miami. Judge Martyak is a member of the Florida Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Christina M Martyak.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Colombia Sufficient sample | 59 | 0 | 59 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 50 | 2 | 48 | 4.0% | 96.0% | View details | |
Haiti Sufficient sample | 42 | 0 | 42 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 41 | 3 | 38 | 7.3% | 92.7% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 32 | 0 | 32 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Sufficient sample | 31 | 4 | 27 | 12.9% | 87.1% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 28 | 4 | 24 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Jamaica Moderate sample | 18 | 0 | 18 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 17 | 0 | 17 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 14 | 0 | 14 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 14 | 8 | 6 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Burkina Faso Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Côte d’Ivoire Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
St. Barthélemy Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Argentina Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Belize Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
59
Grants
0
Denials
59
Total decisions
50
Grants
2
Denials
48
Total decisions
42
Grants
0
Denials
42
Total decisions
41
Grants
3
Denials
38
Total decisions
32
Grants
0
Denials
32
Total decisions
31
Grants
4
Denials
27
Total decisions
28
Grants
4
Denials
24
Total decisions
21
Grants
0
Denials
21
Total decisions
20
Grants
0
Denials
20
Total decisions
18
Grants
0
Denials
18
Total decisions
17
Grants
0
Denials
17
Total decisions
14
Grants
0
Denials
14
Total decisions
14
Grants
8
Denials
6
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.