Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
86
Grants
9
Denials
77
Grant rate: 10.5%Denial rate: 89.5%
Immigration judge
Andrea Koppenhofer
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
57.0%
237 / 416
Total decisions
416
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
57.0%
Grants: 237
Denial rate
43.0%
Denials: 179
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Andrea Koppenhofer as an immigration judge in June 2020. Judge Koppenhofer earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1988 from Dominican Universityand a Juris Doctor in 1991 from IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. From 2016 to 2020, sheserved as a municipal relief judge, in Aurora, Boulder, Centennial, Edgewater, and Thornton,Colorado. From 2015 to 2016, she was a legal consultant and project manager with Grays Peak Strategies, in Arvada, Colorado. From 2011 to 2016, she served as a district court magistrate inthe 19th Judicial District of Colorado. From 2010 to 2011, she was an associate attorney with Harris Family Law Firm, in Denver. From 2007 to 2010, she was an attorney with Blomfelt &Associates, in Windsor, Colorado. From 1999 to 2006, she was in private practice, in Kane County and Du Page County, Illinois. From 1991 to 1995, she served as an assistant state attorneywith the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office, in Chicago. Judge Koppenhofer is a member ofthe Colorado State Bar and Illinois State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants237 / 416
Denials179 / 416
Other relief0 / 416
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Andrea Koppenhofer.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Colombia Sufficient sample | 86 | 9 | 77 | 10.5% | 89.5% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 49 | 46 | 3 | 93.9% | 6.1% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 36 | 1 | 35 | 2.8% | 97.2% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 25 | 21 | 4 | 84.0% | 16.0% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 25 | 2 | 23 | 8.0% | 92.0% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 19 | 16 | 3 | 84.2% | 15.8% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 19 | 11 | 8 | 57.9% | 42.1% | View details | |
Bulgaria Moderate sample | 16 | 16 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 15 | 8 | 7 | 53.3% | 46.7% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 14 | 7 | 7 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 12 | 12 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 11 | 9 | 2 | 81.8% | 18.2% | View details | |
Former Countries Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Guinea Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Albania Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Bolivia Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Libya Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
View details
Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
49
Grants
46
Denials
3
Grant rate: 93.9%Denial rate: 6.1%
Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
36
Grants
1
Denials
35
Grant rate: 2.8%Denial rate: 97.2%
India
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
25
Grants
21
Denials
4
Grant rate: 84.0%Denial rate: 16.0%
Peru
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
25
Grants
2
Denials
23
Grant rate: 8.0%Denial rate: 92.0%
Russia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
19
Grants
16
Denials
3
Grant rate: 84.2%Denial rate: 15.8%
Venezuela
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
19
Grants
11
Denials
8
Grant rate: 57.9%Denial rate: 42.1%
Bulgaria
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
16
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Guatemala
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
8
Denials
7
Grant rate: 53.3%Denial rate: 46.7%
Honduras
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
14
Grants
7
Denials
7
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Spain
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
12
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Nepal
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
9
Denials
2
Grant rate: 81.8%Denial rate: 18.2%
Former Countries
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Guinea
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Turkiye
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
5
Denials
1
Grant rate: 83.3%Denial rate: 16.7%
Albania
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Bolivia
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Haiti
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Libya
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Mauritania
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Brea C Burgie
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 46.0%
- Denial Rate
- 54.0%
Kerri Calcador
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 22.7%
- Denial Rate
- 77.3%
Nina M Carbone
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 35.4%
- Denial Rate
- 64.6%
David J. Cordova
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 39.8%
- Denial Rate
- 60.2%
Melanie K Corrin
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 23.6%
- Denial Rate
- 76.4%
Ivan E Gardzelewski
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 24.5%
- Denial Rate
- 75.5%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.