Immigration judge

Deborah E Klahr

Community discussion · 0

Public EOIR asylum decision statistics

Status
active
Data source
EOIR Case Data

Grant rate

48.4%

666 / 1377

Total decisions

1377

Merits decision sample in current public statistics

Grant rate

48.4%

Grants: 666

Denial rate

51.6%

Denials: 711

Other relief rate

0.0%

Other relief: 0

Judge profile

This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.

Attorney General William Barr appointed Deborah E. Klahr to begin hearing cases in October 2019. Judge Klahr earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1989 from Stern College, Yeshiva Universityand a Juris Doctor in 1992 from Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law. From 2018 to 2019, sheserved first as a supervisory immigration officer and then as a section chief with the New York City Field Office, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in New York. From 2017 to 2018, she served as a senior immigration servicesofficer with the Newark Field Office, USCIS, DHS, in Newark, New Jersey. From 2013 to 2017,she served first as an asylum officer and then as a supervisory asylum officer with the Newark Asylum Office, USCIS, DHS, in Lyndhurst, New Jersey. From 2009 to 2013, she wasimmigration counsel with Lindabury, Mc Cormick, Estabrook & Cooper P.C., in Westfield,New Jersey. From 2004 to 2013, she was an immigration attorney in private practice. From 2000to 2004, she was a senior immigration associate with Merrill R. Cohen & Associates P.C., in New York. From 1997 to 1999, she was a staff attorney for the Bar Association for the City of New York, in New York. From 1996 to 1997, she was a litigation associate with Spector &Ehrenworth P.C., in Florham Park, New Jersey. From 1992 to 1996, she was a staff attorney for JASA/Legal Services for the Elderly, in New York. Judge Klahr is a member of the New Jersey State Bar and New York State Bar.

This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.

Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report

Outcome distribution

Grants666 / 1377
Denials711 / 1377
Other relief0 / 1377

Community perspective

Community discussion

Read public experiences and process discussions related to Deborah E Klahr.

0 topics

You can start with these public topics

  • Share a public process or preparation experience
  • Discuss how to interpret public data
  • Ask a question without personal case details

Case details

0 rows

This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.

Case Ratio

-

Distribution

Showing 0 of 0

View by applicant nationality

Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.

Switzerland

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

445

Grants

310

Denials

135

Grant rate: 69.7%Denial rate: 30.3%

Ecuador

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

143

Grants

2

Denials

141

Grant rate: 1.4%Denial rate: 98.6%

India

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

143

Grants

73

Denials

70

Grant rate: 51.0%Denial rate: 49.0%

Bulgaria

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

82

Grants

56

Denials

26

Grant rate: 68.3%Denial rate: 31.7%

Nepal

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

54

Grants

34

Denials

20

Grant rate: 63.0%Denial rate: 37.0%

Spain

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

45

Grants

7

Denials

38

Grant rate: 15.6%Denial rate: 84.4%

Venezuela

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

36

Grants

0

Denials

36

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Guatemala

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

34

Grants

19

Denials

15

Grant rate: 55.9%Denial rate: 44.1%

Honduras

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

33

Grants

14

Denials

19

Grant rate: 42.4%Denial rate: 57.6%

Former Countries

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

32

Grants

23

Denials

9

Grant rate: 71.9%Denial rate: 28.1%

Russia

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

31

Grants

9

Denials

22

Grant rate: 29.0%Denial rate: 71.0%

Colombia

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

27

Grants

0

Denials

27

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Albania

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

23

Grants

20

Denials

3

Grant rate: 87.0%Denial rate: 13.0%

Mauritania

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

18

Grants

3

Denials

15

Grant rate: 16.7%Denial rate: 83.3%

Pakistan

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

17

Grants

12

Denials

5

Grant rate: 70.6%Denial rate: 29.4%

Peru

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

17

Grants

0

Denials

17

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Bolivia

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

16

Grants

10

Denials

6

Grant rate: 62.5%Denial rate: 37.5%

Georgia

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

14

Grants

3

Denials

11

Grant rate: 21.4%Denial rate: 78.6%

Uzbekistan

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

12

Grants

2

Denials

10

Grant rate: 16.7%Denial rate: 83.3%

Guinea

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

10

Grants

3

Denials

7

Grant rate: 30.0%Denial rate: 70.0%

These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.

Other judges at the same immigration court

Lori Adams

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
79.5%
Denial Rate
20.5%
View details

Matthew T. Adrian

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
51.3%
Denial Rate
48.7%
View details

H. Jere Armstrong

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
33.3%
Denial Rate
66.7%
View details

Terry A. Bain

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
87.6%
Denial Rate
12.4%
View details

Susan M Beschta

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
81.3%
Denial Rate
18.8%
View details

Noel A Brennan

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
87.6%
Denial Rate
12.4%
View details
Disclaimer

This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.