India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
50
Grants
48
Denials
2
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
91.0%
193 / 212
Total decisions
212
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
91.0%
Grants: 193
Denial rate
9.0%
Denials: 19
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Samuel Y. Kim to begin hearing cases in December 2020. Judge Kim earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2000 from Vanderbilt University and a Juris Doctor in 2004 from Washington University in Saint Louis School of Law. From 2018 to 2020,and previously from 2013 to 2014, he was in private practice in San Francisco. From 2014 to 2018, he served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA),Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in San Francisco. From 2011 to 2013, he served as an assistant chief counsel, OPLA, ICE, DHS, in Los Angeles. From 2006 to 2011, he served on active duty as a judge advocate for the Marine Corps Forces Reserve, in New Orleans. From 2004 to 2005, he was in private practice in Saint Louis.Judge Kim is a member of the State Bar of California and the Missouri State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Samuel Y Kim.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
India Sufficient sample | 50 | 48 | 2 | 96.0% | 4.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 39 | 39 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 34 | 27 | 7 | 79.4% | 20.6% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 21 | 21 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 13 | 13 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 10 | 10 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 10 | 8 | 2 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 10 | 8 | 2 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 8 | 8 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Belize Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Bermuda Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ukraine Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Congo - Kinshasa Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Gabon Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | View details | |
Fiji Small sample | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | View details |
Total decisions
50
Grants
48
Denials
2
Total decisions
39
Grants
39
Denials
0
Total decisions
34
Grants
27
Denials
7
Total decisions
21
Grants
21
Denials
0
Total decisions
13
Grants
13
Denials
0
Total decisions
10
Grants
10
Denials
0
Total decisions
10
Grants
8
Denials
2
Total decisions
10
Grants
8
Denials
2
Total decisions
8
Grants
8
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
0
Grants
0
Denials
0
Total decisions
0
Grants
0
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.