Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
95
Grants
10
Denials
85
Grant rate: 10.5%Denial rate: 89.5%
Immigration judge
Ellen Karesh
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
13.2%
67 / 509
Total decisions
509
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
13.2%
Grants: 67
Denial rate
86.8%
Denials: 442
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Ellen L. Karesh was appointed as a Unit Chief Immigration Judge to begin supervisory immigration court duties and hearing cases in October 2021. Judge Karesh earned a Bachelor of Science in 1990 from the University of South Carolina and a Juris Doctor in 1993 from the University of South Carolina School of Law. From 1995 to 2021, she served as a Berkeley County Summary Court Judge, in South Carolina. From 1994 to 2004, she worked in private practice, in Goose Creek, South Carolina. Judge Karesh is a member of the South Carolina Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants67 / 509
Denials442 / 509
Other relief0 / 509
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Ellen Karesh.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 95 | 10 | 85 | 10.5% | 89.5% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 53 | 7 | 46 | 13.2% | 86.8% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 52 | 4 | 48 | 7.7% | 92.3% | View details | |
Brazil Sufficient sample | 45 | 0 | 45 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 40 | 1 | 39 | 2.5% | 97.5% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 35 | 1 | 34 | 2.9% | 97.1% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 35 | 7 | 28 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 34 | 4 | 30 | 11.8% | 88.2% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 11 | 6 | 5 | 54.5% | 45.5% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 10 | 1 | 9 | 10.0% | 90.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 9 | 8 | 1 | 88.9% | 11.1% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14.3% | 85.7% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Singapore Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Angola Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Jordan Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details |
View details
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
53
Grants
7
Denials
46
Grant rate: 13.2%Denial rate: 86.8%
Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
52
Grants
4
Denials
48
Grant rate: 7.7%Denial rate: 92.3%
Brazil
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
45
Grants
0
Denials
45
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
40
Grants
1
Denials
39
Grant rate: 2.5%Denial rate: 97.5%
Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
35
Grants
1
Denials
34
Grant rate: 2.9%Denial rate: 97.1%
Venezuela
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
35
Grants
7
Denials
28
Grant rate: 20.0%Denial rate: 80.0%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
34
Grants
4
Denials
30
Grant rate: 11.8%Denial rate: 88.2%
India
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
6
Denials
5
Grant rate: 54.5%Denial rate: 45.5%
Cuba
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
1
Denials
9
Grant rate: 10.0%Denial rate: 90.0%
Russia
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
8
Denials
1
Grant rate: 88.9%Denial rate: 11.1%
Haiti
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Ecuador
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
1
Denials
6
Grant rate: 14.3%Denial rate: 85.7%
Romania
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
Grant rate: 40.0%Denial rate: 60.0%
Singapore
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Vietnam
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Uzbekistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Angola
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
Bulgaria
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
Jordan
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Abby Anna. Batko-Taylor
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 49.8%
- Denial Rate
- 50.2%
V. Stuart Couch
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 10.9%
- Denial Rate
- 89.1%
Scott D Criss
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 12.8%
- Denial Rate
- 87.2%
Chadwick Dotson
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 18.8%
- Denial Rate
- 81.2%
James C. Graulich
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 10.0%
- Denial Rate
- 90.0%
Rodger C Harris
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 22.9%
- Denial Rate
- 77.1%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.