Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
245
Grants
91
Denials
154
Grant rate: 37.1%Denial rate: 62.9%
Immigration judge
Carrie C Johnson-Papillo
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
22.4%
271 / 1211
Total decisions
1211
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
22.4%
Grants: 271
Denial rate
77.6%
Denials: 940
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Then-Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker appointed Carrie C. Johnson-Papillo to beginsupervisory immigration court duties and hearing cases in March 2019. She will oversee the Elizabeth and Newark immigration courts. Judge Johnson-Papillo earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2000 from Fairfield University and a Juris Doctor in 2003 from Washington University Schoolof law in Saint Louis. From 2008 to 2018, she served as a deputy chief counsel with the Office of Chief Counsel (OCC), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in New York. From 2005 to 2008, she served as the deputy chief in the Knowledge Management Division, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, ICE, DHS, in Washington D.C. From 2003 to 2005, she served as an assistant chief counsel, OCC, ICE, DHS,first in Newark and later in New York. Judge Johnson-Papillo is a member of the State Bar of New York.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants271 / 1211
Denials940 / 1211
Other relief0 / 1211
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Carrie C Johnson-Papillo.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 245 | 91 | 154 | 37.1% | 62.9% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 210 | 4 | 206 | 1.9% | 98.1% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 114 | 13 | 101 | 11.4% | 88.6% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 62 | 16 | 46 | 25.8% | 74.2% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 62 | 10 | 52 | 16.1% | 83.9% | View details | |
Bulgaria Sufficient sample | 51 | 14 | 37 | 27.5% | 72.5% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 45 | 0 | 45 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 45 | 5 | 40 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 34 | 10 | 24 | 29.4% | 70.6% | View details | |
Nepal Sufficient sample | 33 | 6 | 27 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
Nicaragua Sufficient sample | 31 | 27 | 4 | 87.1% | 12.9% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 30 | 0 | 30 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 24 | 1 | 23 | 4.2% | 95.8% | View details | |
Singapore Moderate sample | 23 | 0 | 23 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Guinea Moderate sample | 15 | 6 | 9 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 14 | 8 | 6 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 12 | 4 | 8 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Moderate sample | 11 | 1 | 10 | 9.1% | 90.9% | View details | |
Albania Small sample | 9 | 3 | 6 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Former Countries Small sample | 9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details |
View details
Ecuador
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
210
Grants
4
Denials
206
Grant rate: 1.9%Denial rate: 98.1%
India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
114
Grants
13
Denials
101
Grant rate: 11.4%Denial rate: 88.6%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
62
Grants
16
Denials
46
Grant rate: 25.8%Denial rate: 74.2%
Venezuela
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
62
Grants
10
Denials
52
Grant rate: 16.1%Denial rate: 83.9%
Bulgaria
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
51
Grants
14
Denials
37
Grant rate: 27.5%Denial rate: 72.5%
Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
45
Grants
0
Denials
45
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
45
Grants
5
Denials
40
Grant rate: 11.1%Denial rate: 88.9%
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
34
Grants
10
Denials
24
Grant rate: 29.4%Denial rate: 70.6%
Nepal
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
33
Grants
6
Denials
27
Grant rate: 18.2%Denial rate: 81.8%
Nicaragua
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
31
Grants
27
Denials
4
Grant rate: 87.1%Denial rate: 12.9%
Peru
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
30
Grants
0
Denials
30
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Mexico
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
24
Grants
1
Denials
23
Grant rate: 4.2%Denial rate: 95.8%
Singapore
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
23
Grants
0
Denials
23
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Guinea
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
6
Denials
9
Grant rate: 40.0%Denial rate: 60.0%
Russia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
14
Grants
8
Denials
6
Grant rate: 57.1%Denial rate: 42.9%
Haiti
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
4
Denials
8
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
Uzbekistan
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
1
Denials
10
Grant rate: 9.1%Denial rate: 90.9%
Albania
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
3
Denials
6
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
Former Countries
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
7
Denials
2
Grant rate: 77.8%Denial rate: 22.2%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Lori Adams
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 79.5%
- Denial Rate
- 20.5%
Matthew T. Adrian
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 51.3%
- Denial Rate
- 48.7%
H. Jere Armstrong
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 33.3%
- Denial Rate
- 66.7%
Terry A. Bain
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 87.6%
- Denial Rate
- 12.4%
Susan M Beschta
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 81.3%
- Denial Rate
- 18.8%
Noel A Brennan
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 87.6%
- Denial Rate
- 12.4%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.