India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
186
Grants
104
Denials
82
Grant rate: 55.9%Denial rate: 44.1%
Immigration judge
Lettricea L Jefferson-Webb
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
50.7%
383 / 755
Total decisions
755
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
50.7%
Grants: 383
Denial rate
49.3%
Denials: 372
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Lettricea Jefferson-Webb was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in March 2022. Judge Jefferson-Webb earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1985 from Whittier College in Whittier, California, and a Bachelor of Arts in 1987 from California State University, Long Beach, a Master of Arts in 1993 from Amber University in Garland, Texas, and a Juris Doctor in 1997 from the University of Kentucky College of Law. From 2007 to 2022, she served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Kentucky in Louisville. From 2004 to 2007, she served as an Assistant Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Kentucky in Frankfort. From 1999 to 2004, she served as an Assistant Commonwealth Attorney with the Fayette County Commonwealth Attorney’s Office, in Lexington, Kentucky. From 1998 to 1999, she was Staff Attorney with the Fayette County Legal Aid Society. Judge Jefferson-Webb is a member of the Kentucky Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants383 / 755
Denials372 / 755
Other relief0 / 755
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Lettricea L Jefferson-Webb.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
India Sufficient sample | 186 | 104 | 82 | 55.9% | 44.1% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 89 | 53 | 36 | 59.6% | 40.4% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 71 | 39 | 32 | 54.9% | 45.1% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 69 | 30 | 39 | 43.5% | 56.5% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 68 | 24 | 44 | 35.3% | 64.7% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 40 | 16 | 24 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 30 | 11 | 19 | 36.7% | 63.3% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 22 | 8 | 14 | 36.4% | 63.6% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 22 | 22 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 19 | 5 | 14 | 26.3% | 73.7% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 18 | 14 | 4 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details | |
Brazil Moderate sample | 14 | 10 | 4 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 14 | 3 | 11 | 21.4% | 78.6% | View details | |
Mauritania Moderate sample | 14 | 0 | 14 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Singapore Moderate sample | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 8 | 8 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
View details
Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
89
Grants
53
Denials
36
Grant rate: 59.6%Denial rate: 40.4%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
71
Grants
39
Denials
32
Grant rate: 54.9%Denial rate: 45.1%
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
69
Grants
30
Denials
39
Grant rate: 43.5%Denial rate: 56.5%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
68
Grants
24
Denials
44
Grant rate: 35.3%Denial rate: 64.7%
Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
40
Grants
16
Denials
24
Grant rate: 40.0%Denial rate: 60.0%
Peru
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
30
Grants
11
Denials
19
Grant rate: 36.7%Denial rate: 63.3%
Niue
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
8
Denials
14
Grant rate: 36.4%Denial rate: 63.6%
Russia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
22
Grants
22
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Venezuela
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
19
Grants
5
Denials
14
Grant rate: 26.3%Denial rate: 73.7%
Nepal
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
18
Grants
14
Denials
4
Grant rate: 77.8%Denial rate: 22.2%
Brazil
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
14
Grants
10
Denials
4
Grant rate: 71.4%Denial rate: 28.6%
Cuba
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
14
Grants
3
Denials
11
Grant rate: 21.4%Denial rate: 78.6%
Mauritania
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
14
Grants
0
Denials
14
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Singapore
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
12
Grants
0
Denials
12
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Turkiye
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
8
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Haiti
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
3
Denials
3
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Switzerland
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Vietnam
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
4
Denials
2
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Afghanistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Victoria L. Argumedo
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 4.5%
- Denial Rate
- 95.5%
Samantha Begovich
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 16.8%
- Denial Rate
- 83.2%
Jeffrey J. Bernstein
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 8.8%
- Denial Rate
- 91.2%
Elisa C Brasil
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 88.3%
- Denial Rate
- 11.7%
Jeremy J Butler
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 69.0%
- Denial Rate
- 31.0%
Andrew J Caborn
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 24.3%
- Denial Rate
- 75.7%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.