Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
44
Grants
2
Denials
42
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
26.1%
61 / 234
Total decisions
234
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
26.1%
Grants: 61
Denial rate
73.9%
Denials: 173
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Cait Irwin was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in May 2024. Judge Irwin earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2009 from Texas State University and a Juris Doctor in 2014 from Oklahoma City University School of Law. From 2022 to 2024, she served as an assistant chief counsel with the Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in San Antonio. From 2014 to 2022, she served as an assistant district criminal attorney, serving from 2016 to 2022 in Bexar County, Texas, and from 2014 to 2016 in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma. Judge Irwin is a member of the State Bar of Texas.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Cait Irwin.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 44 | 2 | 42 | 4.5% | 95.5% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 43 | 19 | 24 | 44.2% | 55.8% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 36 | 4 | 32 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 33 | 0 | 33 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 20 | 4 | 16 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 16 | 16 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 12 | 4 | 8 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Iraq Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Azerbaijan Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Bermuda Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Central African Republic Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Lebanon Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ghana Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Kenya Small sample | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
44
Grants
2
Denials
42
Total decisions
43
Grants
19
Denials
24
Total decisions
36
Grants
4
Denials
32
Total decisions
33
Grants
0
Denials
33
Total decisions
20
Grants
4
Denials
16
Total decisions
16
Grants
16
Denials
0
Total decisions
12
Grants
4
Denials
8
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
1
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
1
Denials
0
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
Total decisions
1
Grants
0
Denials
1
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.