Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
391
Grants
9
Denials
382
Grant rate: 2.3%Denial rate: 97.7%
Immigration judge
Lily C Hsu
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
20.5%
409 / 1994
Total decisions
1994
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
20.5%
Grants: 409
Denial rate
79.5%
Denials: 1585
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Barr appointed Lily C. Hsu to begin hearing cases in January 2020. Judge Hsu earned a Bachelor of Science in 1996 from University of California, Berkeley, and a Juris Doctor in 2000 from California Western School of Law. From 2006 to 2019, she served as an assistant chief counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in Los Angeles. From 2009 to 2011, she served as a special assistant U.S. attorney at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California, in Los Angeles. From 2004 to 2006, she served as an asylum officer with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, DHS, in Anaheim, California. From 2001 to 2004, she was an associate attorney at Reeves and Associates ALPC. Judge Hsu is a member of the State Bar of California.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants409 / 1994
Denials1585 / 1994
Other relief0 / 1994
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Lily C Hsu.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 391 | 9 | 382 | 2.3% | 97.7% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 288 | 1 | 287 | 0.3% | 99.7% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 284 | 13 | 271 | 4.6% | 95.4% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 220 | 4 | 216 | 1.8% | 98.2% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 141 | 110 | 31 | 78.0% | 22.0% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 138 | 52 | 86 | 37.7% | 62.3% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 126 | 5 | 121 | 4.0% | 96.0% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 97 | 81 | 16 | 83.5% | 16.5% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 81 | 2 | 79 | 2.5% | 97.5% | View details | |
Armenia Sufficient sample | 51 | 37 | 14 | 72.5% | 27.5% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 50 | 14 | 36 | 28.0% | 72.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 28 | 5 | 23 | 17.9% | 82.1% | View details | |
Belize Moderate sample | 13 | 13 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Iran Moderate sample | 10 | 9 | 1 | 90.0% | 10.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 10 | 8 | 2 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 9 | 8 | 1 | 88.9% | 11.1% | View details | |
Syria Small sample | 8 | 7 | 1 | 87.5% | 12.5% | View details | |
China Small sample | 7 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Kazakhstan Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
View details
Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
288
Grants
1
Denials
287
Grant rate: 0.3%Denial rate: 99.7%
Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
284
Grants
13
Denials
271
Grant rate: 4.6%Denial rate: 95.4%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
220
Grants
4
Denials
216
Grant rate: 1.8%Denial rate: 98.2%
Switzerland
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
141
Grants
110
Denials
31
Grant rate: 78.0%Denial rate: 22.0%
Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
138
Grants
52
Denials
86
Grant rate: 37.7%Denial rate: 62.3%
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
126
Grants
5
Denials
121
Grant rate: 4.0%Denial rate: 96.0%
Russia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
97
Grants
81
Denials
16
Grant rate: 83.5%Denial rate: 16.5%
Peru
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
81
Grants
2
Denials
79
Grant rate: 2.5%Denial rate: 97.5%
Armenia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
51
Grants
37
Denials
14
Grant rate: 72.5%Denial rate: 27.5%
India
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
50
Grants
14
Denials
36
Grant rate: 28.0%Denial rate: 72.0%
Venezuela
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
28
Grants
5
Denials
23
Grant rate: 17.9%Denial rate: 82.1%
Belize
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
13
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Iran
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
9
Denials
1
Grant rate: 90.0%Denial rate: 10.0%
Turkiye
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
8
Denials
2
Grant rate: 80.0%Denial rate: 20.0%
Ecuador
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Egypt
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
8
Denials
1
Grant rate: 88.9%Denial rate: 11.1%
Syria
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
7
Denials
1
Grant rate: 87.5%Denial rate: 12.5%
China
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
7
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Kazakhstan
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Nathan N Aina
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 33.4%
- Denial Rate
- 66.7%
Andrea Hong
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 34.8%
- Denial Rate
- 65.2%
Peter A Kim
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 48.4%
- Denial Rate
- 51.6%
James M Left
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 20.5%
- Denial Rate
- 79.5%
Jake Nare
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 48.4%
- Denial Rate
- 51.6%
Kevin W Riley
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 10.9%
- Denial Rate
- 89.1%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.