Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
74
Grants
10
Denials
64
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
24.9%
73 / 293
Total decisions
293
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
24.9%
Grants: 73
Denial rate
75.1%
Denials: 220
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Meghan E. Heesch was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in February 2023. Judge Heesch earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2007 from the University of Wisconsin- Madison and a Juris Doctor in 2012 from Harvard Law School. From 2015 to 2022, she served as an assistant U.S. attorney at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of California in San Diego, entering on duty through the Attorney General’s Honors Program. From 2013 to 2015, she served as a clinical teaching fellow and supervising attorney in the Detainee Rights Clinic at the University of Minnesota Law School, James H. Binger Center for New Americans. From 2012 to 2013, she served as an attorney advisor at the Orlando Immigration Court, entering on duty through the Attorney General’s Honors Program. Judge Heesch is a member of the Maryland State Bar and the Minnesota State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Meghan E Heesch.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 74 | 10 | 64 | 13.5% | 86.5% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 37 | 25 | 12 | 67.6% | 32.4% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 36 | 5 | 31 | 13.9% | 86.1% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 22 | 4 | 18 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 20 | 1 | 19 | 5.0% | 95.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 9 | 1 | 8 | 11.1% | 88.9% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Spain Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Ghana Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Iran Small sample | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Armenia Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Nepal Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Uzbekistan Small sample | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
India Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
74
Grants
10
Denials
64
Total decisions
37
Grants
25
Denials
12
Total decisions
36
Grants
5
Denials
31
Total decisions
22
Grants
4
Denials
18
Total decisions
20
Grants
1
Denials
19
Total decisions
9
Grants
1
Denials
8
Total decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Total decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Total decisions
6
Grants
2
Denials
4
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
2
Denials
3
Total decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
Total decisions
4
Grants
2
Denials
2
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
2
Denials
2
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Total decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.