Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
106
Grants
2
Denials
104
Grant rate: 1.9%Denial rate: 98.1%
Immigration judge
David A Gardey
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
7.1%
43 / 609
Total decisions
609
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
7.1%
Grants: 43
Denial rate
92.9%
Denials: 566
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
David A. Gardey was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in August 2023. Judge Gardey earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1990 from Yale University and a Juris Doctor in 1993 from the Notre Dame Law School. From 2005 to 2023, he served as an assistant U.S. attorney (AUSA) with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Michigan in Detroit, in various capacities, including: special counsel to the U.S. Attorney, chief of the Public Corruption and Civil Rights Unit, and chief of the Drug Task Force Unit. From 2001 to 2005, he served as an AUSA with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida in Miami. From 1997 to 2001, he was a supervisory attorney for Butzel Long PC in Detroit, and from 1995 to 1997, he was an associate with Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP in New York. From 1993 to 1995, he served as a judicial law clerk for the Honorable Paul V. Gadola of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Judge Gardey is a member of the State Bar of Michigan and the New York State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants43 / 609
Denials566 / 609
Other relief0 / 609
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to David A Gardey.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Honduras Sufficient sample | 106 | 2 | 104 | 1.9% | 98.1% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 83 | 0 | 83 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
St. Barthélemy Sufficient sample | 70 | 0 | 70 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 49 | 0 | 49 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 48 | 0 | 48 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 42 | 5 | 37 | 11.9% | 88.1% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 23 | 1 | 22 | 4.3% | 95.7% | View details | |
Ethiopia Moderate sample | 16 | 9 | 7 | 56.3% | 43.8% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 15 | 1 | 14 | 6.7% | 93.3% | View details | |
Mauritania Moderate sample | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Moderate sample | 10 | 4 | 6 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 8 | 7 | 1 | 87.5% | 12.5% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 8 | 3 | 5 | 37.5% | 62.5% | View details | |
Tristan da Cunha Small sample | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Cuba Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ghana Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
View details
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
83
Grants
0
Denials
83
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
St. Barthélemy
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
70
Grants
0
Denials
70
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Peru
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
49
Grants
0
Denials
49
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
48
Grants
0
Denials
48
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
42
Grants
5
Denials
37
Grant rate: 11.9%Denial rate: 88.1%
Mexico
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
25
Grants
0
Denials
25
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Venezuela
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
23
Grants
1
Denials
22
Grant rate: 4.3%Denial rate: 95.7%
Ethiopia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
16
Grants
9
Denials
7
Grant rate: 56.3%Denial rate: 43.8%
Colombia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
0
Denials
15
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Turkiye
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
15
Grants
1
Denials
14
Grant rate: 6.7%Denial rate: 93.3%
Mauritania
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
13
Grants
0
Denials
13
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Afghanistan
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
4
Denials
6
Grant rate: 40.0%Denial rate: 60.0%
Bulgaria
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
India
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Russia
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
7
Denials
1
Grant rate: 87.5%Denial rate: 12.5%
Switzerland
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
3
Denials
5
Grant rate: 37.5%Denial rate: 62.5%
Tristan da Cunha
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
3
Denials
2
Grant rate: 60.0%Denial rate: 40.0%
Cuba
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Ghana
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Jason E. Braun
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 49.3%
- Denial Rate
- 50.7%
Lorianne Campanella
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 32.9%
- Denial Rate
- 67.1%
Christopher Day
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 100.0%
- Denial Rate
- 0.0%
Dimple Gupta
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 13.9%
- Denial Rate
- 86.1%
Lenka J. Koss
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 10.0%
- Denial Rate
- 90.0%
Michelle L. Lakomy
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 27.9%
- Denial Rate
- 72.1%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.