Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
65
Grants
2
Denials
63
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
6.2%
27 / 435
Total decisions
435
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
6.2%
Grants: 27
Denial rate
93.8%
Denials: 408
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed Steven B. Fuller to begin hearing cases in October 2018. Judge Fuller earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1997 from Auburn University and a Juris Doctorin 2000 from Regent University School of Law. From 2016 to 2018, he was an assistant chiefcounsel with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Department of Homeland Security(DHS) in Lumpkin, Georgia. From 2014 to 2016, he was an associate attorney with the Pearson Law Firm, P.C., in Belton, Texas. From 2009 to 2014, he was an assistant center counsel withthe U.S. Army at Fort Hood, Texas. From 2008 to 2009, he was an assistant chief counsel with ICE, DHS, in Lumpkin, Georgia. From 2001 to 2008, he was an attorney with the U.S. Army Judge Advocate General’s Corps in these locations: Fort Hood, Texas; Fort Benning, Georgia;and Tikrit, Iraq. Judge Fuller is a member of the Texas State Bar and the Kentucky Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Steven B Fuller.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 65 | 2 | 63 | 3.1% | 96.9% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 43 | 0 | 43 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 41 | 2 | 39 | 4.9% | 95.1% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 31 | 0 | 31 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 28 | 0 | 28 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 23 | 1 | 22 | 4.3% | 95.7% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 19 | 0 | 19 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 15 | 2 | 13 | 13.3% | 86.7% | View details | |
Russia Moderate sample | 14 | 5 | 9 | 35.7% | 64.3% | View details | |
Cameroon Moderate sample | 12 | 4 | 8 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Jamaica Moderate sample | 12 | 1 | 11 | 8.3% | 91.7% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 12 | 3 | 9 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Brazil Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Sri Lanka Small sample | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Bulgaria Small sample | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details |
Total decisions
65
Grants
2
Denials
63
Total decisions
43
Grants
0
Denials
43
Total decisions
41
Grants
2
Denials
39
Total decisions
31
Grants
0
Denials
31
Total decisions
28
Grants
0
Denials
28
Total decisions
23
Grants
1
Denials
22
Total decisions
19
Grants
0
Denials
19
Total decisions
15
Grants
2
Denials
13
Total decisions
14
Grants
5
Denials
9
Total decisions
12
Grants
4
Denials
8
Total decisions
12
Grants
1
Denials
11
Total decisions
12
Grants
3
Denials
9
Total decisions
11
Grants
0
Denials
11
Total decisions
9
Grants
0
Denials
9
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
6
Grants
0
Denials
6
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
4
Grants
1
Denials
3
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.