Immigration judge

Philip Fluhr

Community discussion · 0

Public EOIR asylum decision statistics

Status
active
Data source
EOIR Case Data

Grant rate

45.4%

93 / 205

Total decisions

205

Merits decision sample in current public statistics

Grant rate

45.4%

Grants: 93

Denial rate

54.6%

Denials: 112

Other relief rate

0.0%

Other relief: 0

Judge profile

This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.

Philip N. Fluhr was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in November 2023. Judge Fluhr earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1995 from the State University of New York at Binghamton, and a Juris Doctor in 1998 from Loyola University New Orleans School of Law. From 2017 to 2023, and from 2011 to 2016, he served as an assistant U.S. attorney with the U.S. Attorney’s Office at the Northern District of Illinois in Chicago. From 2016 to 2017, he was a partner with Le Clair Ryan in Chicago and Newark, New Jersey. From 2006 to 2011, he served as senior associate general counsel in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence in Washington D.C. From 2002 to 2006, he worked with Connell Foley LLP as an associate in Roseland, New Jersey. From 1998 to 2002, he served with the Judge Advocate General’s Corps of the U.S. Navy, first as a military prosecutor based at Fleet Activities Yokosuka in Japan and then as a legal officer on board the aircraft carrier USS Kitty Hawk, which was homeported in Yokosuka, Japan. From 2003 to 2023, he served as a reserve officer assigned to the following locations: the Pentagon; Naval Station Newport in Rhode Island; Mac Dill Air Force Base in Tampa, Florida; Naval Base San Diego in California; and the Washington Navy Yard. Since affiliating with the reserve component, Judge Fluhr has deployed to the Philippines, Iraq, Qatar, and Afghanistan. Judge Fluhr is a member of the Illinois State Bar, the New Jersey State Bar, and the Pennsylvania Bar.

This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.

Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report

Outcome distribution

Grants93 / 205
Denials112 / 205
Other relief0 / 205

Community perspective

Community discussion

Read public experiences and process discussions related to Philip Fluhr.

0 topics

You can start with these public topics

  • Share a public process or preparation experience
  • Discuss how to interpret public data
  • Ask a question without personal case details

Case details

0 rows

This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.

Case Ratio

-

Distribution

Showing 0 of 0

View by applicant nationality

Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.

Venezuela

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

43

Grants

31

Denials

12

Grant rate: 72.1%Denial rate: 27.9%

Colombia

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

24

Grants

9

Denials

15

Grant rate: 37.5%Denial rate: 62.5%

India

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

19

Grants

4

Denials

15

Grant rate: 21.1%Denial rate: 78.9%

Niue

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

18

Grants

4

Denials

14

Grant rate: 22.2%Denial rate: 77.8%

Honduras

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

15

Grants

2

Denials

13

Grant rate: 13.3%Denial rate: 86.7%

Mexico

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

15

Grants

5

Denials

10

Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%

Russia

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

13

Grants

4

Denials

9

Grant rate: 30.8%Denial rate: 69.2%

Moldova

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

7

Grants

5

Denials

2

Grant rate: 71.4%Denial rate: 28.6%

Switzerland

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

7

Grants

3

Denials

4

Grant rate: 42.9%Denial rate: 57.1%

Kyrgyzstan

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

6

Grants

3

Denials

3

Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%

Ecuador

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

5

Grants

2

Denials

3

Grant rate: 40.0%Denial rate: 60.0%

Kazakhstan

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

5

Grants

5

Denials

0

Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%

Ghana

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

3

Grants

2

Denials

1

Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%

Nicaragua

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

3

Grants

3

Denials

0

Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%

Turkiye

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

3

Grants

0

Denials

3

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Guatemala

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

2

Grants

0

Denials

2

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Mauritania

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

2

Grants

0

Denials

2

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Spain

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

2

Grants

2

Denials

0

Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%

Tonga

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

2

Grants

1

Denials

1

Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%

Ukraine

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

2

Grants

2

Denials

0

Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%

These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.

Other judges at the same immigration court

Maria Baldini-Potermin

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
55.4%
Denial Rate
44.6%
View details

Jody Barilla

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
45.9%
Denial Rate
54.1%
View details

Matthew C. Beese

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
5.9%
Denial Rate
94.1%
View details

Glen L. Bower

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
84.6%
Denial Rate
15.4%
View details

O. John Brahos

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
29.0%
Denial Rate
71.0%
View details

Samuel B Cole

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
48.0%
Denial Rate
52.0%
View details
Disclaimer

This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.