Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
110
Grants
3
Denials
107
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
33.3%
156 / 468
Total decisions
468
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
33.3%
Grants: 156
Denial rate
66.7%
Denials: 312
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed Charles Neil Floyd to begin hearing cases in October 2018. Judge Floyd earned a Bachelor of Science in 1991 from Harding University and a Juris Doctor in 1997 from the University of Arkansas School of Law. From 2009 to 2018, he was anassistant chief counsel with Immigration Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Tacoma, Washington. From 2004 to 2009, he served as an assistant U.S. attorney atthe U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia. From 1998 to 2004, he was a judgeadvocate with the U.S. Army in Fort Benning, Georgia and Joint Base Lewis-Mc Chord near Tacoma, Washington. In 2016, he also deployed to Bagdad, Iraq. Judge Floyd is a member of the Arkansas Bar and the Washington State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Charles Neil Floyd.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 110 | 3 | 107 | 2.7% | 97.3% | View details | |
Cameroon Sufficient sample | 74 | 49 | 25 | 66.2% | 33.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 31 | 0 | 31 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Honduras Moderate sample | 27 | 2 | 25 | 7.4% | 92.6% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 21 | 17 | 4 | 81.0% | 19.0% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 21 | 6 | 15 | 28.6% | 71.4% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 21 | 13 | 8 | 61.9% | 38.1% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 18 | 8 | 10 | 44.4% | 55.6% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 16 | 3 | 13 | 18.8% | 81.3% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 14 | 11 | 3 | 78.6% | 21.4% | View details | |
Somalia Moderate sample | 10 | 4 | 6 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details | |
Colombia Small sample | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Russia Small sample | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Venezuela Small sample | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1% | 42.9% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Dominican Republic Small sample | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 80.0% | View details | |
Ukraine Small sample | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ghana Small sample | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details |
Total decisions
110
Grants
3
Denials
107
Total decisions
74
Grants
49
Denials
25
Total decisions
31
Grants
0
Denials
31
Total decisions
27
Grants
2
Denials
25
Total decisions
21
Grants
17
Denials
4
Total decisions
21
Grants
6
Denials
15
Total decisions
21
Grants
13
Denials
8
Total decisions
18
Grants
8
Denials
10
Total decisions
16
Grants
3
Denials
13
Total decisions
14
Grants
11
Denials
3
Total decisions
10
Grants
4
Denials
6
Total decisions
7
Grants
0
Denials
7
Total decisions
7
Grants
4
Denials
3
Total decisions
7
Grants
4
Denials
3
Total decisions
6
Grants
1
Denials
5
Total decisions
6
Grants
3
Denials
3
Total decisions
5
Grants
1
Denials
4
Total decisions
5
Grants
5
Denials
0
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Total decisions
4
Grants
2
Denials
2
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.