Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
48
Grants
7
Denials
41
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
34.5%
82 / 238
Total decisions
238
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
34.5%
Grants: 82
Denial rate
65.5%
Denials: 156
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William Barr appointed Jason D. Ferguson to begin hearing cases in October 2019. Judge Ferguson earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2006 from Texas Tech University and a Juris Doctor in 2009 from University of Houston Law Center. From 2016 to 2019, he served as firstassistant district attorney for the 119th Judicial District of Texas, in San Angelo, Texas. From 2012 to 2016, he served as an assistant district attorney for the 51st and 119th Judicial Districtsof Texas, in San Angelo, Texas. From 2010 to 2012, he served as an assistant district attorney forthe 31st Judicial District of Texas, in Pampa, Texas. Judge Ferguson is a member of the Texas State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Jason D Ferguson.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 48 | 7 | 41 | 14.6% | 85.4% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 43 | 8 | 35 | 18.6% | 81.4% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 25 | 2 | 23 | 8.0% | 92.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Moderate sample | 22 | 4 | 18 | 18.2% | 81.8% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 17 | 15 | 2 | 88.2% | 11.8% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 11 | 6 | 5 | 54.5% | 45.5% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 9 | 9 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 8 | 3 | 5 | 37.5% | 62.5% | View details | |
Niue Small sample | 8 | 3 | 5 | 37.5% | 62.5% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
India Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ukraine Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Georgia Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Central African Republic Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Romania Small sample | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
48
Grants
7
Denials
41
Total decisions
43
Grants
8
Denials
35
Total decisions
25
Grants
2
Denials
23
Total decisions
22
Grants
4
Denials
18
Total decisions
17
Grants
15
Denials
2
Total decisions
11
Grants
6
Denials
5
Total decisions
9
Grants
9
Denials
0
Total decisions
8
Grants
3
Denials
5
Total decisions
8
Grants
3
Denials
5
Total decisions
6
Grants
4
Denials
2
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Total decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Total decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Total decisions
3
Grants
0
Denials
3
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
Total decisions
2
Grants
0
Denials
2
Total decisions
2
Grants
2
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.