Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
232
Grants
63
Denials
169
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
21.5%
233 / 1084
Total decisions
1084
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
21.5%
Grants: 233
Denial rate
78.5%
Denials: 851
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed Emily N. Farrar-Crockett to begin hearing cases in October 2018. Judge Farrar-Crockett earned a Bachelor of Science in 1997 from Murray State University and a Juris Doctor in 2001 from Tulane Law School. From 2015 to 2018, she was animmigration attorney in private practice in Louisville, Kentucky. From 2013 to 2015, she was anassociate immigration attorney with Mc Clain De Wees, PLLC, in Louisville. From 2001 to 2013,she was an attorney with the Louisville Metro Public Defender Office. In the same office,concurrently from 2006 to 2013, she was the deputy division chief of the Juvenile Trial Division.Judge Farrar-Crockett is a member of the Kentucky Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Emily Farrar-Crockett.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 232 | 63 | 169 | 27.2% | 72.8% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 201 | 11 | 190 | 5.5% | 94.5% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 160 | 19 | 141 | 11.9% | 88.1% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 104 | 1 | 103 | 1.0% | 99.0% | View details | |
St. Barthélemy Sufficient sample | 87 | 2 | 85 | 2.3% | 97.7% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 68 | 17 | 51 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 40 | 24 | 16 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 26 | 10 | 16 | 38.5% | 61.5% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 24 | 5 | 19 | 20.8% | 79.2% | View details | |
Afghanistan Moderate sample | 17 | 17 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Cuba Moderate sample | 15 | 8 | 7 | 53.3% | 46.7% | View details | |
Mauritania Moderate sample | 11 | 3 | 8 | 27.3% | 72.7% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 8 | 8 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 8 | 7 | 1 | 87.5% | 12.5% | View details | |
Egypt Small sample | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Eritrea Small sample | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Bolivia Small sample | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
India Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details |
Total decisions
232
Grants
63
Denials
169
Total decisions
201
Grants
11
Denials
190
Total decisions
160
Grants
19
Denials
141
Total decisions
104
Grants
1
Denials
103
Total decisions
87
Grants
2
Denials
85
Total decisions
68
Grants
17
Denials
51
Total decisions
40
Grants
24
Denials
16
Total decisions
26
Grants
10
Denials
16
Total decisions
24
Grants
5
Denials
19
Total decisions
17
Grants
17
Denials
0
Total decisions
15
Grants
8
Denials
7
Total decisions
11
Grants
3
Denials
8
Total decisions
8
Grants
8
Denials
0
Total decisions
8
Grants
7
Denials
1
Total decisions
6
Grants
6
Denials
0
Total decisions
5
Grants
3
Denials
2
Total decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Total decisions
5
Grants
3
Denials
2
Total decisions
4
Grants
2
Denials
2
Total decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.