Russia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
38
Grants
34
Denials
4
Grant rate: 89.5%Denial rate: 10.5%
Immigration judge
Carla Espinoza
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
59.3%
147 / 248
Total decisions
248
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
59.3%
Grants: 147
Denial rate
40.7%
Denials: 101
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Carla I. Espinoza was appointed as an immigration judge to begin hearing cases in August 2023. Judge Espinoza earned a Bachelor of Science in 2009 from the University of Texas at El Paso, and a Juris Doctor and a Certificate in International and Comparative Law in 2012 from De Paul University College of Law. From 2020 to 2023, she was the managing partner, and from 2013 to 2020, she was supervising and managing attorney, for Chicago Immigration Advocates Law Offices. From 2012 to 2013, she served as a supervising attorney with Solis Law Firm PC in Chicago. Judge Espinoza is a member of the Illinois State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants147 / 248
Denials101 / 248
Other relief0 / 248
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Carla Espinoza.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Russia Sufficient sample | 38 | 34 | 4 | 89.5% | 10.5% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 33 | 21 | 12 | 63.6% | 36.4% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 24 | 22 | 2 | 91.7% | 8.3% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 23 | 8 | 15 | 34.8% | 65.2% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Mexico Moderate sample | 11 | 5 | 6 | 45.5% | 54.5% | View details | |
Honduras Small sample | 9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details | |
Nicaragua Small sample | 9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8% | 22.2% | View details | |
Haiti Small sample | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Small sample | 7 | 2 | 5 | 28.6% | 71.4% | View details | |
Kyrgyzstan Small sample | 7 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Small sample | 6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Guatemala Small sample | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Spain Small sample | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Mauritania Small sample | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Belize Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Guinea Small sample | 3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% | 33.3% | View details | |
Tristan da Cunha Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Turkiye Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 66.7% | View details |
View details
Venezuela
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
33
Grants
21
Denials
12
Grant rate: 63.6%Denial rate: 36.4%
Niue
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
24
Grants
22
Denials
2
Grant rate: 91.7%Denial rate: 8.3%
Colombia
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
23
Grants
8
Denials
15
Grant rate: 34.8%Denial rate: 65.2%
India
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
0
Denials
11
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Mexico
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
11
Grants
5
Denials
6
Grant rate: 45.5%Denial rate: 54.5%
Honduras
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
7
Denials
2
Grant rate: 77.8%Denial rate: 22.2%
Nicaragua
Small sampleTotal decisions
9
Grants
7
Denials
2
Grant rate: 77.8%Denial rate: 22.2%
Haiti
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
0
Denials
8
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Ecuador
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
2
Denials
5
Grant rate: 28.6%Denial rate: 71.4%
Kyrgyzstan
Small sampleTotal decisions
7
Grants
7
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Switzerland
Small sampleTotal decisions
6
Grants
2
Denials
4
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
Guatemala
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
0
Denials
5
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Spain
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
3
Denials
2
Grant rate: 60.0%Denial rate: 40.0%
Mauritania
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
2
Denials
2
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Belize
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Guinea
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
2
Denials
1
Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%
Tristan da Cunha
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Turkiye
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
Vietnam
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
1
Denials
2
Grant rate: 33.3%Denial rate: 66.7%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Maria Baldini-Potermin
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 55.4%
- Denial Rate
- 44.6%
Jody Barilla
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 45.9%
- Denial Rate
- 54.1%
Matthew C. Beese
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 5.9%
- Denial Rate
- 94.1%
Glen L. Bower
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 84.6%
- Denial Rate
- 15.4%
O. John Brahos
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 29.0%
- Denial Rate
- 71.0%
Samuel B Cole
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 48.0%
- Denial Rate
- 52.0%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.