Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
335
Grants
10
Denials
325
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
34.6%
582 / 1684
Total decisions
1684
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
34.6%
Grants: 582
Denial rate
65.4%
Denials: 1102
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General Eric Holder appointed Judge Dorfman in July 2011. Judge Dorfman received a bachelor of arts degree in 1996 from the University of California, Los Angeles, and a juris doctorate in 2000 from Loyola Law School. From 2009 to 2011, she served as senior attorney for the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), in Los Angeles. From March 2003 to 2009, she was an assistant chief counsel for ICE. From 2000 to February 2003, she was an assistant chief counsel for the former Immigration and Naturalization Service. Judge Dorfman is a member of the State Bar of Arizona.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Arlene E Dorfman.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mexico Sufficient sample | 335 | 10 | 325 | 3.0% | 97.0% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 239 | 37 | 202 | 15.5% | 84.5% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 219 | 17 | 202 | 7.8% | 92.2% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 172 | 101 | 71 | 58.7% | 41.3% | View details | |
Armenia Sufficient sample | 125 | 106 | 19 | 84.8% | 15.2% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 88 | 57 | 31 | 64.8% | 35.2% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 64 | 58 | 6 | 90.6% | 9.4% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 58 | 13 | 45 | 22.4% | 77.6% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 52 | 8 | 44 | 15.4% | 84.6% | View details | |
Peru Sufficient sample | 52 | 8 | 44 | 15.4% | 84.6% | View details | |
Iran Sufficient sample | 38 | 26 | 12 | 68.4% | 31.6% | View details | |
Venezuela Moderate sample | 25 | 7 | 18 | 28.0% | 72.0% | View details | |
Colombia Moderate sample | 22 | 0 | 22 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Uganda Moderate sample | 19 | 17 | 2 | 89.5% | 10.5% | View details | |
Egypt Moderate sample | 15 | 14 | 1 | 93.3% | 6.7% | View details | |
Ukraine Moderate sample | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Syria Moderate sample | 14 | 13 | 1 | 92.9% | 7.1% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 10 | 8 | 2 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 10 | 9 | 1 | 90.0% | 10.0% | View details | |
Somalia Moderate sample | 10 | 4 | 6 | 40.0% | 60.0% | View details |
Total decisions
335
Grants
10
Denials
325
Total decisions
239
Grants
37
Denials
202
Total decisions
219
Grants
17
Denials
202
Total decisions
172
Grants
101
Denials
71
Total decisions
125
Grants
106
Denials
19
Total decisions
88
Grants
57
Denials
31
Total decisions
64
Grants
58
Denials
6
Total decisions
58
Grants
13
Denials
45
Total decisions
52
Grants
8
Denials
44
Total decisions
52
Grants
8
Denials
44
Total decisions
38
Grants
26
Denials
12
Total decisions
25
Grants
7
Denials
18
Total decisions
22
Grants
0
Denials
22
Total decisions
19
Grants
17
Denials
2
Total decisions
15
Grants
14
Denials
1
Total decisions
15
Grants
15
Denials
0
Total decisions
14
Grants
13
Denials
1
Total decisions
10
Grants
8
Denials
2
Total decisions
10
Grants
9
Denials
1
Total decisions
10
Grants
4
Denials
6
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.