Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
157
Grants
66
Denials
91
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
63.1%
772 / 1223
Total decisions
1223
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
63.1%
Grants: 772
Denial rate
36.9%
Denials: 451
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Judge Daw was appointed as an Immigration Judge in May 2006. She received a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1985 from the University of California, Berkeley, and a Juris Doctorate in 1988 from Georgetown University Law Center. Judge Daw served as an assistant U.S. attorney in San Jose, California, from September 1999 to June 2005. She worked as a deputy county counsel for the County of Amador, Jackson, California, from September 1996 to September 1999. Judge Daw was in private practice from September 1988 to September 1996. She is a member of the California Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Alison E Daw.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 157 | 66 | 91 | 42.0% | 58.0% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 151 | 136 | 15 | 90.1% | 9.9% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 121 | 101 | 20 | 83.5% | 16.5% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 100 | 53 | 47 | 53.0% | 47.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 96 | 50 | 46 | 52.1% | 47.9% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 96 | 35 | 61 | 36.5% | 63.5% | View details | |
Afghanistan Sufficient sample | 69 | 61 | 8 | 88.4% | 11.6% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 53 | 28 | 25 | 52.8% | 47.2% | View details | |
Indonesia Sufficient sample | 50 | 26 | 24 | 52.0% | 48.0% | View details | |
Armenia Moderate sample | 27 | 17 | 10 | 63.0% | 37.0% | View details | |
Eritrea Moderate sample | 27 | 27 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Haiti Moderate sample | 22 | 7 | 15 | 31.8% | 68.2% | View details | |
Nepal Moderate sample | 21 | 15 | 6 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Niue Moderate sample | 19 | 5 | 14 | 26.3% | 73.7% | View details | |
Ukraine Moderate sample | 19 | 18 | 1 | 94.7% | 5.3% | View details | |
Iran Moderate sample | 16 | 11 | 5 | 68.8% | 31.3% | View details | |
Madagascar Moderate sample | 16 | 9 | 7 | 56.3% | 43.8% | View details | |
Kazakhstan Moderate sample | 13 | 13 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Belize Moderate sample | 10 | 10 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 9 | 9 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
157
Grants
66
Denials
91
Total decisions
151
Grants
136
Denials
15
Total decisions
121
Grants
101
Denials
20
Total decisions
100
Grants
53
Denials
47
Total decisions
96
Grants
50
Denials
46
Total decisions
96
Grants
35
Denials
61
Total decisions
69
Grants
61
Denials
8
Total decisions
53
Grants
28
Denials
25
Total decisions
50
Grants
26
Denials
24
Total decisions
27
Grants
17
Denials
10
Total decisions
27
Grants
27
Denials
0
Total decisions
22
Grants
7
Denials
15
Total decisions
21
Grants
15
Denials
6
Total decisions
19
Grants
5
Denials
14
Total decisions
19
Grants
18
Denials
1
Total decisions
16
Grants
11
Denials
5
Total decisions
16
Grants
9
Denials
7
Total decisions
13
Grants
13
Denials
0
Total decisions
10
Grants
10
Denials
0
Total decisions
9
Grants
9
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.