Immigration judge

Xiomara Diana Davis-Gumbs

Community discussion · 0

Public EOIR asylum decision statistics

Status
active
Data source
EOIR Case Data

Grant rate

17.6%

149 / 849

Total decisions

849

Merits decision sample in current public statistics

Grant rate

17.6%

Grants: 149

Denial rate

82.5%

Denials: 700

Other relief rate

0.0%

Other relief: 0

Judge profile

This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.

Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Judge Davis-Gumbs to begin hearing cases in January 2016. Judge Davis-Gumbs earned a Bachelor of Science degree in 1983 from John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York and a Juris Doctor in 1992 from Touro College, Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center. From 2008 through 2015, Judge Davis-Gumbs served in the Office of the Chief Counsel, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in Dallas, in various capacities including deputy chief counsel, and previously as associate counsel, Central Law Division, and as associate counsel, Training and Knowledge Management Division. From 2002 through 2008, Judge Davis-Gumbs served as assistant chief counsel in the Office of Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DHS, in Newark, N.J. From 1997 through 2002, Judge Davis-Gumbs served as an asylum officer in the Office of International Affairs, in the former Immigration and Naturalization Service, U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), in Rosedale, N.Y. From 1994 through 1997, Judge Davis-Gumbs served as special assistant/litigation coordinator for the Federal Bureau of Prisons, DOJ, in New York, N.Y. From 1993 through 1994, Judge Davis-Gumbs served as a law clerk, and from 1988 through 1993, as an inmate grievance counselor in the Trial Unit, New York City Department of Corrections. Judge Davis-Gumbs is a member of the New York Bar.

This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.

Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report

Outcome distribution

Grants149 / 849
Denials700 / 849
Other relief0 / 849

Community perspective

Community discussion

Read public experiences and process discussions related to Xiomara Diana Davis-Gumbs.

0 topics

You can start with these public topics

  • Share a public process or preparation experience
  • Discuss how to interpret public data
  • Ask a question without personal case details

Case details

0 rows

This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.

Case Ratio

-

Distribution

Showing 0 of 0

View by applicant nationality

Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.

Spain

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

146

Grants

7

Denials

139

Grant rate: 4.8%Denial rate: 95.2%

Honduras

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

130

Grants

2

Denials

128

Grant rate: 1.5%Denial rate: 98.5%

Venezuela

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

115

Grants

26

Denials

89

Grant rate: 22.6%Denial rate: 77.4%

Mexico

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

112

Grants

0

Denials

112

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Guatemala

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

61

Grants

1

Denials

60

Grant rate: 1.6%Denial rate: 98.4%

Cuba

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

35

Grants

6

Denials

29

Grant rate: 17.1%Denial rate: 82.9%

Nicaragua

Sufficient sample
View details

Total decisions

30

Grants

11

Denials

19

Grant rate: 36.7%Denial rate: 63.3%

Niue

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

27

Grants

1

Denials

26

Grant rate: 3.7%Denial rate: 96.3%

Colombia

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

21

Grants

0

Denials

21

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Egypt

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

14

Grants

13

Denials

1

Grant rate: 92.9%Denial rate: 7.1%

Switzerland

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

11

Grants

7

Denials

4

Grant rate: 63.6%Denial rate: 36.4%

Cameroon

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

10

Grants

6

Denials

4

Grant rate: 60.0%Denial rate: 40.0%

Ethiopia

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

10

Grants

10

Denials

0

Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%

Romania

Moderate sample
View details

Total decisions

10

Grants

0

Denials

10

Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%

Turkiye

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

9

Grants

7

Denials

2

Grant rate: 77.8%Denial rate: 22.2%

Afghanistan

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

7

Grants

4

Denials

3

Grant rate: 57.1%Denial rate: 42.9%

Central African Republic

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

6

Grants

4

Denials

2

Grant rate: 66.7%Denial rate: 33.3%

Ecuador

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

6

Grants

1

Denials

5

Grant rate: 16.7%Denial rate: 83.3%

Iraq

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

5

Grants

3

Denials

2

Grant rate: 60.0%Denial rate: 40.0%

Jordan

Small sample
View details

Total decisions

5

Grants

4

Denials

1

Grant rate: 80.0%Denial rate: 20.0%

These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.

Other judges at the same immigration court

Michael P. Baird

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
18.3%
Denial Rate
81.7%
View details

David Beyleryan

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
0.0%
Denial Rate
100.0%
View details

Attila Bogdan

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
1.3%
Denial Rate
98.7%
View details

Anthony Brown

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
3.7%
Denial Rate
96.3%
View details

Gary D. Burkholder

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
9.0%
Denial Rate
91.0%
View details

Monique Carreras-Amadeo

Status: active

Asylum Grant Rate
30.8%
Denial Rate
69.2%
View details
Disclaimer

This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.