Venezuela
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
62
Grants
24
Denials
38
Grant rate: 38.7%Denial rate: 61.3%
Immigration judge
Brendan C Curran
Community discussion · 0Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
- Status
- active
- Data source
- EOIR Case Data
Grant rate
29.3%
173 / 591
Total decisions
591
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
29.3%
Grants: 173
Denial rate
70.7%
Denials: 418
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
Judge profile
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Attorney General William P. Barr appointed Brendan Curran as an Immigration Judge in October 2020. Judge Curran earned a Bachelor of Arts in 1990 from Marquette University and a Juris Doctor in 1994 from De Paul University College of Law. From 2007 to 2020, he served asan assistant chief counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor,Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Chicago. From 1999 to 2007, he served as an assistant state attorney for the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office, in Chicago. From 1994 to 1999, he served as an officer in the Judge Advocate General’s(JAG) Corps of the U.S. Navy. He was stationed at Naval Training Center Great Lakes, in Illinois, and at sea aboard USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74). He remains a JAG in the reservecomponent of the U.S. Navy, having mobilized and deployed overseas in support of Operation Noble Eagle in 2013. Judge Curran is a member of the Illinois State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Outcome distribution
Grants173 / 591
Denials418 / 591
Other relief0 / 591
Community perspective
Community discussion
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Brendan C Curran.
0 topics
You can start with these public topics
- Share a public process or preparation experience
- Discuss how to interpret public data
- Ask a question without personal case details
Case details
0 rowsThis table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Case Ratio
-
Distribution
Showing 0 of 0
View by applicant nationality
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 62 | 24 | 38 | 38.7% | 61.3% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 56 | 5 | 51 | 8.9% | 91.1% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 44 | 0 | 44 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 43 | 1 | 42 | 2.3% | 97.7% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 40 | 22 | 18 | 55.0% | 45.0% | View details | |
Spain Sufficient sample | 39 | 4 | 35 | 10.3% | 89.7% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 37 | 17 | 20 | 45.9% | 54.1% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 36 | 6 | 30 | 16.7% | 83.3% | View details | |
Kyrgyzstan Sufficient sample | 32 | 10 | 22 | 31.3% | 68.8% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 29 | 11 | 18 | 37.9% | 62.1% | View details | |
India Moderate sample | 28 | 7 | 21 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 24 | 12 | 12 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Moderate sample | 21 | 1 | 20 | 4.8% | 95.2% | View details | |
Syria Moderate sample | 10 | 9 | 1 | 90.0% | 10.0% | View details | |
Moldova Small sample | 8 | 6 | 2 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Somalia Small sample | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% | 20.0% | View details | |
Afghanistan Small sample | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details | |
Cameroon Small sample | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | 50.0% | View details | |
Jordan Small sample | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | View details | |
Belize Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
View details
Mexico
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
56
Grants
5
Denials
51
Grant rate: 8.9%Denial rate: 91.1%
Colombia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
44
Grants
0
Denials
44
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Guatemala
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
43
Grants
1
Denials
42
Grant rate: 2.3%Denial rate: 97.7%
Russia
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
40
Grants
22
Denials
18
Grant rate: 55.0%Denial rate: 45.0%
Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
39
Grants
4
Denials
35
Grant rate: 10.3%Denial rate: 89.7%
Niue
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
37
Grants
17
Denials
20
Grant rate: 45.9%Denial rate: 54.1%
Honduras
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
36
Grants
6
Denials
30
Grant rate: 16.7%Denial rate: 83.3%
Kyrgyzstan
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
32
Grants
10
Denials
22
Grant rate: 31.3%Denial rate: 68.8%
Nicaragua
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
29
Grants
11
Denials
18
Grant rate: 37.9%Denial rate: 62.1%
India
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
28
Grants
7
Denials
21
Grant rate: 25.0%Denial rate: 75.0%
Switzerland
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
24
Grants
12
Denials
12
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Ecuador
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
21
Grants
1
Denials
20
Grant rate: 4.8%Denial rate: 95.2%
Syria
Moderate sampleTotal decisions
10
Grants
9
Denials
1
Grant rate: 90.0%Denial rate: 10.0%
Moldova
Small sampleTotal decisions
8
Grants
6
Denials
2
Grant rate: 75.0%Denial rate: 25.0%
Somalia
Small sampleTotal decisions
5
Grants
4
Denials
1
Grant rate: 80.0%Denial rate: 20.0%
Afghanistan
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
4
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
Cameroon
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
2
Denials
2
Grant rate: 50.0%Denial rate: 50.0%
Jordan
Small sampleTotal decisions
4
Grants
0
Denials
4
Grant rate: 0.0%Denial rate: 100.0%
Belize
Small sampleTotal decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
Grant rate: 100.0%Denial rate: 0.0%
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Other judges at the same immigration court
Maria Baldini-Potermin
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 55.4%
- Denial Rate
- 44.6%
Jody Barilla
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 45.9%
- Denial Rate
- 54.1%
Matthew C. Beese
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 5.9%
- Denial Rate
- 94.1%
Glen L. Bower
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 84.6%
- Denial Rate
- 15.4%
O. John Brahos
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 29.0%
- Denial Rate
- 71.0%
Samuel B Cole
Status: active
- Asylum Grant Rate
- 48.0%
- Denial Rate
- 52.0%
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.