Spain
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
785
Grants
250
Denials
535
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
47.0%
1425 / 3034
Total decisions
3034
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
47.0%
Grants: 1425
Denial rate
53.0%
Denials: 1609
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Judge Crosland was appointed as an ACIJ in June 2000. He received a Bachelor of Science degree in 1959 from Auburn University and a Juris Doctorate in 1966 from the University of Alabama. Judge Crosland served as an Immigration Judge at the Immigration Court in Otay Mesa, California, from May 1997 to June 2000. From 1981 to 1987, Judge Crosland practiced immigration law in Washington, DC, as a partner with the law firms of Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver and Crosland, Strand, Freeman & Mayock. He served as general counsel and acting commissioner for the INS from 1977 to 1981. Judge Crosland served as an adjunct professor of law at George Washington School of Law in 1997 and the District of Columbia School of Law from 1990 to 1997. He is a member of the Alabama, Georgia, and District of Columbia Bars.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to David W Crosland.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spain Sufficient sample | 785 | 250 | 535 | 31.8% | 68.2% | View details | |
Ethiopia Sufficient sample | 358 | 309 | 49 | 86.3% | 13.7% | View details | |
Cameroon Sufficient sample | 275 | 205 | 70 | 74.5% | 25.5% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 262 | 57 | 205 | 21.8% | 78.2% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 248 | 88 | 160 | 35.5% | 64.5% | View details | |
Haiti Sufficient sample | 152 | 34 | 118 | 22.4% | 77.6% | View details | |
Eritrea Sufficient sample | 81 | 68 | 13 | 84.0% | 16.0% | View details | |
Switzerland Sufficient sample | 66 | 48 | 18 | 72.7% | 27.3% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 59 | 28 | 31 | 47.5% | 52.5% | View details | |
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 59 | 21 | 38 | 35.6% | 64.4% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 52 | 16 | 36 | 30.8% | 69.2% | View details | |
Pakistan Sufficient sample | 50 | 35 | 15 | 70.0% | 30.0% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 39 | 5 | 34 | 12.8% | 87.2% | View details | |
Nicaragua Sufficient sample | 36 | 17 | 19 | 47.2% | 52.8% | View details | |
Nepal Sufficient sample | 32 | 13 | 19 | 40.6% | 59.4% | View details | |
Guinea Moderate sample | 26 | 15 | 11 | 57.7% | 42.3% | View details | |
Peru Moderate sample | 19 | 4 | 15 | 21.1% | 78.9% | View details | |
Central African Republic Moderate sample | 17 | 9 | 8 | 52.9% | 47.1% | View details | |
Iran Moderate sample | 15 | 9 | 6 | 60.0% | 40.0% | View details | |
Tonga Moderate sample | 15 | 11 | 4 | 73.3% | 26.7% | View details |
Total decisions
785
Grants
250
Denials
535
Total decisions
358
Grants
309
Denials
49
Total decisions
275
Grants
205
Denials
70
Total decisions
262
Grants
57
Denials
205
Total decisions
248
Grants
88
Denials
160
Total decisions
152
Grants
34
Denials
118
Total decisions
81
Grants
68
Denials
13
Total decisions
66
Grants
48
Denials
18
Total decisions
59
Grants
28
Denials
31
Total decisions
59
Grants
21
Denials
38
Total decisions
52
Grants
16
Denials
36
Total decisions
50
Grants
35
Denials
15
Total decisions
39
Grants
5
Denials
34
Total decisions
36
Grants
17
Denials
19
Total decisions
32
Grants
13
Denials
19
Total decisions
26
Grants
15
Denials
11
Total decisions
19
Grants
4
Denials
15
Total decisions
17
Grants
9
Denials
8
Total decisions
15
Grants
9
Denials
6
Total decisions
15
Grants
11
Denials
4
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.