Venezuela
Sufficient sampleTotal decisions
105
Grants
76
Denials
29
Immigration judge
Public EOIR asylum decision statistics
Grant rate
51.6%
354 / 686
Total decisions
686
Merits decision sample in current public statistics
Grant rate
51.6%
Grants: 354
Denial rate
48.4%
Denials: 332
Other relief rate
0.0%
Other relief: 0
This profile is summarized from public sources for background context only. It is not an ImmJudge evaluation.
Elizabeth Crites was appointed as an Immigration Judge to begin hearing cases in April 2021.Judge Crites earned a Bachelor of Arts in 2005 from Ball State University and a Juris Doctor in 2009 from the University of Illinois Chicago John Marshall Law School. From 2016 to 2021, sheserved as an Assistant Chief Counsel, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, in Chicago. From 2009 to 2016, shewas an Associate Attorney with Broyles, Kight & Ricafort PC, in Chicago. Judge Crites is amember of the Illinois State Bar.
This summary is based on public material and may not reflect the latest assignment information.
Source: TRAC Judge Report · View original report
Community perspective
Read public experiences and process discussions related to Elizabeth Crites.
You can start with these public topics
This table shows anonymized case details. It does not include applicant names, case numbers, A Numbers, or EOIR internal case IDs. Results are informational only, not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Showing 0 of 0
Review this judge's historical asylum outcomes for applicants from different nationalities.
| Nationality | Total decisions | Grants | Denials | Grant rate | Denial rate | Distribution | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Venezuela Sufficient sample | 105 | 76 | 29 | 72.4% | 27.6% | View details | |
Niue Sufficient sample | 101 | 45 | 56 | 44.6% | 55.4% | View details | |
Honduras Sufficient sample | 61 | 38 | 23 | 62.3% | 37.7% | View details | |
Colombia Sufficient sample | 51 | 23 | 28 | 45.1% | 54.9% | View details | |
Russia Sufficient sample | 43 | 34 | 9 | 79.1% | 20.9% | View details | |
India Sufficient sample | 41 | 4 | 37 | 9.8% | 90.2% | View details | |
Mexico Sufficient sample | 36 | 9 | 27 | 25.0% | 75.0% | View details | |
Ecuador Sufficient sample | 33 | 3 | 30 | 9.1% | 90.9% | View details | |
Guatemala Sufficient sample | 33 | 8 | 25 | 24.2% | 75.8% | View details | |
Spain Moderate sample | 28 | 13 | 15 | 46.4% | 53.6% | View details | |
Switzerland Moderate sample | 19 | 16 | 3 | 84.2% | 15.8% | View details | |
Kyrgyzstan Moderate sample | 18 | 8 | 10 | 44.4% | 55.6% | View details | |
Nicaragua Moderate sample | 14 | 10 | 4 | 71.4% | 28.6% | View details | |
Moldova Moderate sample | 13 | 12 | 1 | 92.3% | 7.7% | View details | |
Turkiye Moderate sample | 12 | 7 | 5 | 58.3% | 41.7% | View details | |
Peru Small sample | 9 | 2 | 7 | 22.2% | 77.8% | View details | |
Pakistan Small sample | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3% | 16.7% | View details | |
Tonga Small sample | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Vietnam Small sample | 4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% | 25.0% | View details | |
Ethiopia Small sample | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% | View details |
Total decisions
105
Grants
76
Denials
29
Total decisions
101
Grants
45
Denials
56
Total decisions
61
Grants
38
Denials
23
Total decisions
51
Grants
23
Denials
28
Total decisions
43
Grants
34
Denials
9
Total decisions
41
Grants
4
Denials
37
Total decisions
36
Grants
9
Denials
27
Total decisions
33
Grants
3
Denials
30
Total decisions
33
Grants
8
Denials
25
Total decisions
28
Grants
13
Denials
15
Total decisions
19
Grants
16
Denials
3
Total decisions
18
Grants
8
Denials
10
Total decisions
14
Grants
10
Denials
4
Total decisions
13
Grants
12
Denials
1
Total decisions
12
Grants
7
Denials
5
Total decisions
9
Grants
2
Denials
7
Total decisions
6
Grants
5
Denials
1
Total decisions
4
Grants
3
Denials
1
Total decisions
4
Grants
3
Denials
1
Total decisions
3
Grants
3
Denials
0
These statistics come from public EOIR data. They reflect historical statistics only, are not legal advice, and cannot predict any individual case outcome.
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
Status: active
This website is for general information only and is not legal advice.